Back to Search
Start Over
A systematic review of reasons for and against asking patients about their socioeconomic contexts
- Source :
- International Journal for Equity in Health, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2019), International Journal for Equity in Health
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- BMC, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Background People’s social and economic circumstances are important determinants of their health, health experiences, healthcare access, and healthcare outcomes. However, patients’ socioeconomic circumstances are rarely asked about or documented in healthcare settings. We conducted a systematic review of published reasons for why patients’ socioeconomic contexts (including education, employment, occupation, housing, income, or wealth) should, or should not, be enquired about. Methods Systematic review of literature published up to and including 2016. A structured literature search using databases of medicine and nursing (pubmed, embase, global health), ethics (Ethicsweb), social sciences (Web of Science), and psychology (PsychINFO) was followed by a ‘snowball’ search. Eligible publications contained one or more reasons for: asking patients about socioeconomic circumstances; collecting patients’ socioeconomic information; ‘screening’ patients for adverse socioeconomic circumstances; or linking other sources of individual socioeconomic data to patients’ healthcare records. Two authors conducted the screening: the first screened all references, the second author screened a 20% sample with inter-rater reliability statistically confirmed. ‘Reason data’ was extracted from eligible publications by two authors, then analysed and organised. Results We identified 138 eligible publications. Most offered reasons for why patients’ should be asked about their socioeconomic circumstances. Reasons included potential improvements in: individual healthcare outcomes; healthcare service monitoring and provision; population health research and policies. Many authors also expressed concerns for improving equity in health. Eight publications suggested patients should not be asked about their socioeconomic circumstances, due to: potential harms; professional boundaries; and the information obtained being inaccurate or unnecessary. Conclusions This first summary of literature on the subject found many published reasons for why patients’ social and economic circumstances should be enquired about in healthcare settings. These reasons include potential benefits at the levels of individuals, health service provision, and population, as well as the potential to improve healthcare equity. Cautions and caveats include concerns about the clinician’s role in responding to patients’ social problems; the perceived importance of social health determinants compared with biomedical factors; the use of average population data from geographic areas to infer the socioeconomic experience of individuals. Actual evidence of outcomes is lacking: our review suggests hypotheses that can be tested in future research.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Population
Population health
Disclosure
Socioeconomic factors
Health Services Accessibility
03 medical and health sciences
Social determinants of health
Health care
medicine
Humans
education
Socioeconomic status
Health policy
education.field_of_study
Medical records
030505 public health
business.industry
Health Policy
Public health
lcsh:Public aspects of medicine
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Health services research
Reproducibility of Results
lcsh:RA1-1270
Professional-Patient Relations
Health Services
Family medicine
Systematic Review
0305 other medical science
Psychology
business
Delivery of Health Care
Confidentiality
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14759276
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- International Journal for Equity in Health
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....5a559df54268efdcef51e1eac5cb52a9