How to better monitor and clean irregular surfaces in operating rooms: Insights gained by using both ATP luminescence and RODAC assays

Background A major limitation to developing evidence-based approaches to infection prevention is the paucity of real-time, quantitative methods for monitoring the cleanliness of environmental surfaces in clinical settings. One solution that has been proposed is adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assays, but this method does not provide information about the source of the ATP. Materials/Methods To address this gap, we conducted a study in which ATP bioluminescence was coupled with traditional RODAC sampling and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry to assess which organisms were viable and present. Using this mixed assessment approach, we evaluated cleaning of 5 different types of high-touch surfaces (overhead lights, door handles, anesthesia keyboards, mattresses, and side tables) in operating rooms. Results Whether surfaces tested cleaner after turnaround than they did before turnaround depended on the surface type. Before and after cleaning, flat, covered surfaces (mattresses and side tables) were more likely to pass as “clean” by ATP assay than uncovered, irregularly shaped surfaces (overhead lights, door handles, and anesthesia keyboards). Irregularly shaped surfaces were more likely to pass by RODAC assay than by ATP assay after cleaning. Conclusion Our results suggest that irregularly shaped surfaces in operating rooms may require enhanced covering, cleaning, and monitoring protocols compared to more regularly shaped surfaces.