Back to Search Start Over

Self-selected or imposed exercise? A different approach for affective comparisons

Authors :
Tony Meireles Santos
Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho Oliveira
Fábio Yuzo Nakamura
Andrea Camaz Deslandes
Bruno Ferreira Viana
Source :
Journal of Sports Sciences. 33:777-785
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited, 2014.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the psychological and physiological responses of self-selected and imposed sessions of equivalent intensities and durations and allowing to participants a free control of pace during the self-selected session. Seventeen participants completed three sessions on a cycle ergometer. Participant's VO2Peak and lactate threshold were measured during an incremental exercise test. During the second and third sessions, participants could view a virtual cyclist on a monitor. During the self-selected session, participants were allowed free control of the intensity and duration. To ensure that the imposed session replicated the self-selected session in intensity, participants were instructed to follow an additional virtual cyclist, which was displayed on a monitor using the CompuTrainer 3D software. Power output and physiological and psychological variables were recorded during the sessions. A two-way ANOVA showed no effect of condition for power output (P = 0.940), heart rate (HR) (P = 0.965), VO2 (P = 0.898), blood lactate (P = 0.667), Feeling Scale (P = 0.877), Felt Arousal Scale (P = 0.924) and CR100 (P = 0.939). A paired t-test showed no significant difference in Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale scores between sessions (P = 0.054). In contrast to previous studies, the self-selected session did not provide better affective responses than the imposed session with same intensity and duration.

Details

ISSN :
1466447X and 02640414
Volume :
33
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Sports Sciences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5978121b61d66e3dd17c5d58bba3ac71
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.968191