Back to Search Start Over

Brachial artery diameter as a marker for cardiovascular risk assessment: FMD-J study

Authors :
Takuzo Hano
Yasuki Kihara
Koichi Node
Yusuke Ohya
Masato Kajikawa
Haruki Hashimoto
Yumiko Iwamoto
Kensuke Noma
Yukihito Higashi
Takeshi Matsumoto
Tsutomu Yamazaki
Takayuki Hidaka
Kazuaki Chayama
Noritaka Fujimura
Kazuomi Kario
Masataka Sata
Farina Mohamad Yusoff
Yasuhiko Takemoto
Teruo Inoue
Hiroshi Ito
Naomi Idei
Yoshiki Aibara
Nozomu Oda
Ayumu Nakashima
Koji Maemura
Shinsuke Mikami
Shogo Matsui
Tomoko Ishizu
Hirofumi Tomiyama
Kentaro Watanabe
Hisao Ikeda
Shinichiro Ueda
Shinji Koba
Akimichi Iwamoto
Taiji Furukawa
Toru Suzuki
Tatsuya Maruhashi
Junko Soga
Chikara Goto
Tomoo Furumoto
Shinji Kishimoto
Takahide Kohro
Akira Yamashina
Yutaka Ishibashi
Bonpei Takase
Source :
Atherosclerosis. 268:92-98
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2018.

Abstract

Baseline brachial artery (BBA) diameter has been reported to be a potential confounding factor of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between BBA diameter and cardiovascular risk factors and compare the diagnostic accuracy of BBA diameter in subjects without cardiovascular risk factors and patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) with that of FMD.We measured BBA diameter and FMD in 5695 male subjects. In addition, we retrospectively investigated the incidence of cardiovascular events using another population sample consisting of 440 male subjects, to compare the accuracy of BBA diameter with that of FMD in predicting cardiovascular events.BBA diameter and FMD significantly correlated with age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and glucose as well as Framingham risk score. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and CVD increased with the increase in BBA diameter and FMD. Area under the curve (AUC) value of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for BBA diameter to diagnose subjects without cardiovascular risk factors (0.59 vs. 0.62, p = 0.001) or patients with CVD (0.58 vs. 0.64, p 0.001) was significantly lower than that for FMD. In the retrospective study, the AUC value of the ROC curve for BBA diameter to predict first major cardiovascular events was significantly lower than that of FMD (0.50 vs. 0.62, p = 0.03).In men, BBA diameter was inferior to FMD for assessment of cardiovascular risk.

Details

ISSN :
00219150
Volume :
268
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Atherosclerosis
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....583fdc23e6156075f5bd8dc6f5bc62a8