Back to Search Start Over

Development of Sensitive Droplet Digital PCR Assays for Detecting Urinary TERT Promoter Mutations as Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Detection of Urothelial Cancer

Authors :
James McKay
Florence Le Calvez-Kelm
Catherine Voegele
Tiffany M. Delhomme
Ghislaine Scelo
Maria I. Zvereva
Antoine Boureille
Andrei R O S E Salas
Sonia Meziani
Berengere De Tilly
Pauline Francois
Gilles Polo
Olesia Lole
Geoffroy Durand
Patrice H. Avogbe
Emmanuel Vian
Nathalie Forey
Eduard Pisarev
Selin Bilici
Matthieu Foll
Rui Henrique
Carmen Jerónimo
Graham Byrnes
Ismail Hosen
Arnaud Manel
Sara Monteiro-Reis
Source :
Cancers, Vol 12, Iss 3541, p 3541 (2020), Cancers, Volume 12, Issue 12
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2020.

Abstract

Somatic mutations in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter regions are frequent events in urothelial cancer (UC) and their detection in urine (supernatant cell-free DNA or DNA from exfoliated cells) could serve as putative non-invasive biomarkers for UC detection and monitoring. However, detecting these tumor-borne mutations in urine requires highly sensitive methods, capable of measuring low-level mutations. In this study, we developed sensitive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays for detecting TERT promoter mutations (C228T, C228A, CC242-243TT, and C250T). We tested the C228T and C250T ddPCR assays on all samples with sufficient quantity of urinary DNA (urine supernatant cell-free DNA (US cfDNA) or urine pellet cellular DNA (UP cellDNA)) from the DIAGURO (n = 89/93 cases and n = 92/94 controls) and from the IPO-PORTO (n = 49/50 cases and n = 50/50 controls) series that were previously screened with the UroMuTERT assay and compared the performance of the two approaches. In the DIAGURO series, the sensitivity and specificity of the ddPCR assays for detecting UC using either US cfDNA or UP cellDNA were 86.8% and 92.4%. The sensitivity was slightly higher than that of the UroMuTERT assay in the IPO-PORTO series (67.4% vs. 65.3%, respectively), but not in the DIAGURO series (86.8% vs. 90.7%). The specificity was 100% in the IPO-PORTO controls for both the UroMuTERT and ddPCR assays, whereas in the DIAGURO series, the specificity dropped for ddPCR (92.4% versus 95.6%). Overall, an almost perfect agreement between the two methods was observed for both US cfDNA (n = 164<br />kappa coefficient of 0.91) and UP cellDNA (n = 280<br />kappa coefficient of 0.94). In a large independent series of serial urine samples from DIAGURO follow-up BC cases (n = 394), the agreement between ddPCR and UroMuTERT was (i) strong (kappa coefficient of 0.87), regardless of urine DNA types (kappa coefficient 0.89 for US cfDNA and 0.85 for UP cellDNA), (ii) the highest for samples with mutant allelic fractions (MAFs) &gt<br />2% (kappa coefficient of 0.99) and (iii) only minimal for the samples with the lowest MAFs (&lt<br />0.5%<br />kappa coefficient 0.32). Altogether, our results indicate that the two methods (ddPCR and UroMuTERT) for detecting urinary TERT promoter mutations are comparable and that the discrepancies relate to the detection of low-allelic fraction mutations. The simplicity of the ddPCR assays makes them suitable for implementation in clinical settings.

Details

ISSN :
20726694
Volume :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancers
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....572f1afd597be8b4fa1ebffb3c711141