Back to Search Start Over

Optimal Force–Velocity Profile in Ballistic Movements—Altius

Authors :
Enrico Rejc
Pierre Samozino
Pietro Enrico di Prampero
Jean-Benoit Morin
Alain Belli
Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité (LIBM )
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])
Source :
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), 2012, 44 (2), pp.313-322. ⟨10.1249/MSS.0b013e31822d757a⟩
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2012.

Abstract

Purpose: The study�s purpose was to determine the respective influences of the maximal power ( Equation (Uncited) Image Tools ) and the force�velocity (F�v) mechanical profile of the lower limb neuromuscular system on performance in ballistic movements. Methods: A theoretical integrative approach was proposed to express ballistic performance as a mathematical function of Equation (Uncited) Image Tools and F�v profile. This equation was (i) validated from experimental data obtained on 14 subjects during lower limb ballistic inclined push-offs and (ii) simulated to quantify the respective influence of Equation (Uncited) Image Tools and F�v profile on performance. Results: The bias between performances predicted and obtained from experimental measurements was 4%�7%, confirming the validity of the proposed theoretical approach. Simulations showed that ballistic performance was mostly influenced not only by Equation (Uncited) Image Tools but also by the balance between force and velocity capabilities as described by the F�v profile. For each individual, there is an optimal F�v profile that maximizes performance, whereas unfavorable F�v balances lead to differences in performance up to 30% for a given Equation (Uncited) Image Tools . This optimal F�v profile, which can be accurately determined, depends on some individual characteristics (limb extension range, Equation (Uncited) Image Tools ) and on the afterload involved in the movement (inertia, inclination). The lower the afterload, the more the optimal F�v profile is oriented toward velocity capabilities and the greater the limitation of performance imposed by the maximal velocity of lower limb extension. Conclusions: High ballistic performances are determined by both maximization of the power output capabilities and optimization of the F�v mechanical profile of the lower limb neuromuscular system.

Details

ISSN :
01959131 and 15300315
Volume :
44
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....554d18ebab9ede43d00b020bd68f86ae