Back to Search Start Over

Antigenic modulation limits the effector cell mechanisms employed by type I anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies

Authors :
Mark S. Cragg
Thomas R. W. Tipton
Patrick J. Duriez
Robert J. Oldham
Ruth R. French
Lekh N. Dahal
Matthew J. Carter
C. Ian Mockridge
Kerry L. Cox
Ali Roghanian
Stephen A. Beers
Philip G. Hargreaves
Source :
Blood. 125:1901-1909
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
American Society of Hematology, 2015.

Abstract

Following the success of rituximab, 2 other anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), ofatumumab and obinutuzumab, have entered clinical use. Ofatumumab has enhanced capacity for complement-dependent cytotoxicity, whereas obinutuzumab, a type II mAb, lacks the ability to redistribute into lipid rafts and is glycoengineered for augmented antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). We previously showed that type I mAbs such as rituximab have a propensity to undergo enhanced antigenic modulation compared with type II. Here we assessed the key effector mechanisms affected, comparing type I and II antibodies of various isotypes in ADCC and antibody-dependent cellular-phagocytosis (ADCP) assays. Rituximab and ofatumumab depleted both normal and leukemic human CD20-expressing B cells in the mouse less effectively than glycoengineered and wild-type forms of obinutuzumab, particularly when human immunoglobulin G1 (hIgG1) mAbs were compared. In contrast to mouse IgG2a, hIgG1 mAbs were ineffective in ADCC assays with murine natural killer cells as effectors, whereas ADCP was equivalent for mouse IgG2a and hIgG1. However, rituximab's ability to elicit both ADCC and ADCP was reduced by antigenic modulation, whereas type II antibodies remained unaffected. These data demonstrate that ADCP and ADCC are impaired by antigenic modulation and that ADCP is the main effector function employed in vivo.

Details

ISSN :
15280020 and 00064971
Volume :
125
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Blood
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....553e49c9005d28d707e04a4ddf8032f2
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-07-588376