Back to Search Start Over

Association between different dual trigger dosages and in vitro fertilization results in patients with patient-oriented strategies encompassing individualized oocyte number group IV

Authors :
Min Kyu Kang
Min Kyoung Kim
Tae Hyung Kim
Ji Won Kim
Eun Mi Chang
Sang Woo Lyu
Jin Young Kim
Woo Sik Lee
Source :
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science. 65:215-222
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022.

Abstract

Objective Dual trigger is used to induce final oocyte maturation during the process of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, yet yielding controversial results. Also, there are yet no data regarding the effect of the dosage of the dual trigger on clinical outcomes. Based on the Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) criteria, this study aimed to determine the clinical difference of a single bolus versus two boluses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in POSEIDON group IV patients using dual trigger.Methods We screened a total of 1,256 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles who met the POSEIDON group IV criteria. Six hundred and twenty-nine patients received one bolus of GnRHa, and 627 patients were given two boluses. All patients received the same dose of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin during the dual trigger cycle.Results Metaphase II oocyte retrieval rate, fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate did not differ between the two groups. However, a lower percentage of at least one top-quality embryo transfer (34.3% vs. 26.0%, P=0.001) in the two bolus-GnRHa group was noted.Conclusion A double bolus of GnRHa did not show superior clinical results compared to a single bolus of GnRHa in the dual trigger IVF cycle. Therefore, GnRHa doses for use should be decided based on individual clinical situations considering cost-effectiveness and patient compliance, but further investigation will be needed.

Subjects

Subjects :
Obstetrics and Gynecology

Details

ISSN :
22878580
Volume :
65
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....552d80b377f48ec8d262db2c83ab820a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.21317