Back to Search Start Over

A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing

Authors :
Grace Patlewicz
James D. Yager
Marcel Leist
Sebastian Hoffmann
Kerstin Trentz
James M. McKim
Andreas Schepky
Joanna Jaworska
Greet Schoeters
Emily A. McVey
Joanne Zurlo
Bas J. Blaauboer
Nigel Skinner
Thomas B. Knudsen
Paul A. Locke
Ian Kimber
Irmela Ruhdel
Annamaria Rossi
Marian Turner
Michael Schwarz
Costanza Rovida
Robert Landsiedel
Mardas Daneshian
Gladys Ouedraogo
Alan M. Goldberg
Robert Burrier
Nina Hasiwa
Harvey J. Clewell
Olavi Pelkonen
Gavin Maxwell
Thomas Hartung
Erwin Ludo Roggen
Philippe Vanparys
Chantra Eskes
David A. Basketter
Source :
Scopus-Elsevier
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Systemic toxicity testing forms the cornerstone for the safety evaluation of substances. Pressures to move from traditional animal models to novel technologies arise from various concerns, including: the need to evaluate large numbers of previously untested chemicals and new products (such as nanoparticles or cell therapies), the limited predictivity of traditional tests for human health effects, duration and costs of current approaches, and animal welfare considerations. The latter holds especially true in the context of the scheduled 2013 marketing ban on cosmetic ingredients tested for systemic toxicity. Based on a major analysis of the status of alternative methods (Adler et al., 2011) and its independent review (Hartung et al., 2011), the present report proposes a roadmap for how to overcome the acknowledged scientific gaps for the full replacement of systemic toxicity testing using animals. Five whitepapers were commissioned addressing toxicokinetics, skin sensitization, repeated-dose toxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity testing. An expert workshop of 35 participants from Europe and the US discussed and refined these whitepapers, which were subsequently compiled to form the present report. By prioritizing the many options to move the field forward, the expert group hopes to advance regulatory science.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Scopus-Elsevier
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....55232ebe5310d926b57a8f77868c1268