Back to Search Start Over

Risk aversion, prudence, and asset allocation: a review and some new developments

Authors :
Michel Denuit
Louis Eeckhoudt
Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain (UCL)
Institut de statistique
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 (LEM)
Université d'Artois (UA)-Université catholique de Lille (UCL)-Université de Lille-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Theory and Decision, Theory and Decision, Springer Verlag, 2015, 80 (2), pp.227--243. ⟨10.1007/s11238-015-9503-2⟩, Theory and Decision, 2015, 80 (2), pp.227--243. ⟨10.1007/s11238-015-9503-2⟩
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2015.

Abstract

International audience; In this paper, we consider the composition of an optimal portfolio made of two dependent risky assets. The investor is first assumed to be a risk-averse expected utility maximizer, and we recover the existing conditions under which all these investors hold at least some percentage of their portfolio in one of the assets. Then, we assume that the decision maker is not only risk-averse, but also prudent and we obtain new minimum demand conditions as well as intuitively appealing interpretations for them. Finally, we consider the general case of investor’s preferences exhibiting risk apportionment of any order and we derive the corresponding minimum demand conditions. As a byproduct, we obtain conditions such that an investor holds either a positive quantity of one of the assets (positive demand condition) or a proportion greater than 50 % (i.e., the “50 % rule”).

Details

ISSN :
15737187 and 00405833
Volume :
80
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Theory and Decision
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....54cfe68ab3fda5e79fdfb42d77d612ea