Back to Search Start Over

The global Alzheimer's Association round robin study on plasma amyloid β methods

Authors :
Ulf Andreasson
Stefan Palme
Charlotte E. Teunissen
Randall J. Bateman
Kaj Blennow
Leticia Sarasa
Yan Li
Teresa Waligorska
Oskar Hansson
Akinori Nakamura
Kimberley Mauroo
Ashvini Keshavan
Shieh-Yueh Yang
Henrik Zetterberg
Pedro Pesini
Kwasi G. Mawuenyega
Naoki Kaneko
Tobias Bittner
Inge M.W. Verberk
Leslie M. Shaw
Vitaliy Ovod
Erik Stoops
Noelia Fandos
Erik Stomrud
Jeffrey L. Dage
Huei-Chun Liu
Hugo Vanderstichele
José-Antonio Allué
Josef Pannee
María Pascual-Lucas
Ritsuko Yoda
Jonathan M. Schott
Erik Portelius
Magdalena Korecka
James G. Bollinger
Laboratory Medicine
Amsterdam Neuroscience - Neurodegeneration
Amsterdam Neuroscience - Neuroinfection & -inflammation
Source :
Alzheimer's & Dementia : Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Pannee, J, Shaw, L M, Korecka, M, Waligorska, T, Teunissen, C E, Stoops, E, Vanderstichele, H M J, Mauroo, K, Verberk, I M W, Keshavan, A, Pesini, P, Sarasa, L, Pascual-Lucas, M, Fandos, N, Allué, J-A, Portelius, E, Andreasson, U, Yoda, R, Nakamura, A, Kaneko, N, Yang, S-Y, Liu, H-C, Palme, S, Bittner, T, Mawuenyega, K G, Ovod, V, Bollinger, J, Bateman, R J, Li, Y, Dage, J L, Stomrud, E, Hansson, O, Schott, J M, Blennow, K & Zetterberg, H 2021, ' The global Alzheimer's Association round robin study on plasma amyloid β methods ', Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, vol. 13, no. 1, e12242 . https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12242, Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp n/a-n/a (2021), Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, 13(1):e12242. Elsevier BV
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2021.

Abstract

Introduction Blood‐based assays to measure brain amyloid beta (Aβ) deposition are an attractive alternative to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)–based assays currently used in clinical settings. In this study, we examined different blood‐based assays to measure Aβ and how they compare among centers and assays. Methods Aliquots from 81 plasma samples were distributed to 10 participating centers. Seven immunological assays and four mass‐spectrometric methods were used to measure plasma Aβ concentrations. Results Correlations were weak for Aβ42 while Aβ40 correlations were stronger. The ratio Aβ42/Aβ40 did not improve the correlations and showed weak correlations. Discussion The poor correlations for Aβ42 in plasma might have several potential explanations, such as the high levels of plasma proteins (compared to CSF), sensitivity to pre‐analytical sample handling and specificity, and cross‐reactivity of different antibodies. Different methods might also measure different pools of plasma Aβ42. We, however, hypothesize that greater correlations might be seen in future studies because many of the methods have been refined during completion of this study.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23528729
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Alzheimer's & Dementia : Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....543b7d0eb97ee2b1975e06d62f7696ce