Back to Search
Start Over
Epidemiology, Endovascular Treatment, and Prognosis of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: US Center Study of 152 Patients
- Source :
- Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2017.
-
Abstract
- Background Cerebral venous thrombosis is a rare cause of stroke that poses diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic challenges. Mainstay treatment is systemic anticoagulation, but endovascular treatment is increasingly advocated. Our objectives were to describe the epidemiology, treatment, and prognosis of 152 patients with cerebral venous thrombosis. Methods and Results This was a retrospective study of consecutive cerebral venous thrombosis cases from 2006 to 2013 at a comprehensive stroke center through hospital discharge. Predictors of full recovery (modified Rankin Scale scores 0–1) were analyzed with multiple logistic regression and presented as adjusted odds ratios ( AORs ) with 95% confidence intervals ( CIs ). The population was young (average age: 42 years), majority female (69%), and commonly presenting with cerebral edema (63%), and 72% were transferred in. All patients received systemic anticoagulation; 49% (n=73) required endovascular treatment. Reasons for requiring endovascular treatment included cerebral edema, herniation, or hemorrhagic infarct (n=38); neurologic decline (n=17); rethrombosis, persistent occlusion, or clot propagation (n=10); extensive clot burden (n=7); and persistent headache despite anticoagulation (n=1). There were 7 (10%) procedural complications. Recanalization was successful (61%), partial (30%), and unsuccessful (9%). Overall, 60% fully recovered. Positive predictors of full recovery included hormonal etiology, particularly for patients who were transferred in ( AOR : 7.06 [95% CI, 2.27–21.96], interaction P =0.03) and who had migraine history ( AOR : 4.87 [95% CI, 1.01–23.50], P =0.05), whereas negative predictors of full recovery were cerebral edema ( AOR : 0.11 [95% CI, 0.04–0.34], P AOR : 0.28 [95% CI, 0.09–0.96], P =0.04). Conclusions As one of the largest cohort studies, our findings suggest that cerebral edema, history of migraine, and hormonal etiology were prognostic and that endovascular treatment might be a safe and effective treatment for cerebral venous thrombosis when conventional management is inadequate.
- Subjects :
- Male
Time Factors
Epidemiology
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
0302 clinical medicine
Modified Rankin Scale
migraine
Stroke
Original Research
Thrombectomy
Venous Thrombosis
Academic Medical Centers
education.field_of_study
Incidence
Endovascular Procedures
Hemorrhagic infarct
Survival Rate
Venous thrombosis
Treatment Outcome
endovascular Treatment
Female
Mortality/Survival
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Colorado
brain
Population
Cerebrovascular Procedures
Cerebral edema
outcomes research
03 medical and health sciences
medicine
Humans
education
Retrospective Studies
business.industry
cerebral venous thrombosis
Retrospective cohort study
medicine.disease
Cerebral Angiography
Surgery
Treatment
Etiology
Cerebrovascular Disease/Stroke
Intracranial Thrombosis
business
edema
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Follow-Up Studies
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 20479980
- Volume :
- 6
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American Heart Association
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....53c77074bd3132b3533a65b89cf0b2d4
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.117.005480