Back to Search Start Over

Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study

Authors :
Luisa Bordeje, M.
Montejo, Juan C.
Lidon Mateu, M.
Solera, Manuel
Acosta, Jose A.
Juan, Mar
Garcia-Cordoba, Francisco
Garcia-Martinez, Miguel A.
Gastaldo, Rosa
Acosta, Jose
Albert, Inmaculada
Alec, Alfonso
Luisa Bordeje, Ma
Calvo, Enrique
Ferre, Merce
Garcia de Lorenzo, Abelardo
Angel Garcia-Martinez, Miguel
Gonzalez-Iglesias, Carlos
Iglesias, Rayden
Lorencio, Carol
Martinez de la Gandara, Amalia
Lidon Mateu, Ma
Mesejo, Alfonso
Martinez-Garcia, Pilar
Carlos Montejo, Juan
Luisa Navarrete, Ma
Ortiz-Leyba, Carlos
Robles, Angel
Sanchez-Alvarez, Carmen
Vaquerizo, Clara
Vila, Belen
Carlos Yebenes, Juan
Zabarte, Mercedes
PIANE STUDY GRP SPAIN
Source :
Nutrients, Vol 11, Iss 11, p 2616 (2019), Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Nutrients, Volume 11, Issue 11, r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA, instname, r-FISABIO: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2019.

Abstract

To determine whether elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is associated with a higher rate of enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal (GI) complications<br />to assess the value of IAP as a predictor of enteral nutrition (EN) intolerance. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients on mechanical ventilation requiring at least 5 days of EN were recruited for a prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study. EN was performed and GI complications were managed with an established protocol. IAP was determined via a urinary catheter. Patients who developed any GI complications were considered as presenting EN intolerance. Variables related to EN, IAP and GI complications were monitored daily. Statistical analysis compared patients without GI complications (group A) vs. GI complications (group B). 247 patients were recruited from 28 participating ICUs (group A: 119, group B: 128). No differences between groups were recorded. Patients in group B (p &lt<br />0.001) spent more days on EN (8.1 ± 8.4 vs. 18.1 ± 13.7), on mechanical ventilation (8.0 ± 7.7 vs. 19.3 ± 14.9) and in the ICU (12.3 ± 11.4 vs. 24.8 ± 17.5). IAP prior to the GI complication was (14.3 ± 3.1 vs. 15.8 ± 4.8) (p &lt<br />0.003). The best IAP value identified for EN intolerance was 14 mmHg but it had low sensitivity and specificity. Although a higher IAP was associated with EN intolerance, IAP alone did not emerge as a good predictor of EN intolerance in critically ill patients.

Details

ISSN :
20726643
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Nutrients
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....53552fe90368a9f0296403318918cacb