Back to Search Start Over

Using a Clinicopathologic and Gene Expression (CP-GEP) Model to Identify Stage I-II Melanoma Patients at Risk of Disease Relapse

Authors :
Evalyn E. A. P. Mulder
Iva Johansson
Dirk J. Grünhagen
Dennie Tempel
Barbara Rentroia-Pacheco
Jvalini T. Dwarkasing
Daniëlle Verver
Antien L. Mooyaart
Astrid A. M. van der Veldt
Marlies Wakkee
Tamar E. C. Nijsten
Cornelis Verhoef
Jan Mattsson
Lars Ny
Loes M. Hollestein
Roger Olofsson Bagge
Surgery
Medical Oncology
Pathology
Radiology & Nuclear Medicine
Dermatology
Source :
Cancers, 14(12):2854. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Cancers; Volume 14; Issue 12; Pages: 2854
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The current standard of care for patients without sentinel node (SN) metastasis (i.e., stage I–II melanoma) is watchful waiting, while >40% of patients with stage IB–IIC will eventually present with disease recurrence or die as a result of melanoma. With the prospect of adjuvant therapeutic options for patients with a negative SN, we assessed the performance of a clinicopathologic and gene expression (CP-GEP) model, a model originally developed to predict SN metastasis, to identify patients with stage I–II melanoma at risk of disease relapse. Methods: This study included patients with cutaneous melanoma ≥18 years of age with a negative SN between October 2006 and December 2017 at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Sweden) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (The Netherlands). According to the CP-GEP model, which can be applied to the primary melanoma tissue, the patients were stratified into high or low risk of recurrence. The primary aim was to assess the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of low- and high-risk CP-GEP. A secondary aim was to compare the CP-GEP model with the EORTC nomogram, a model based on clinicopathological variables only. Results: In total, 535 patients (stage I–II) were included. CP-GEP stratification among these patients resulted in a 5-year RFS of 92.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 86.4–96.4) in CP-GEP low-risk patients (n = 122) versus 80.7% (95%CI: 76.3–84.3) in CP-GEP high-risk patients (n = 413; hazard ratio 2.93 (95%CI: 1.41–6.09), p < 0.004). According to the EORTC nomogram, 25% of the patients were classified as having a ‘low risk’ of recurrence (96.8% 5-year RFS (95%CI 91.6–98.8), n = 130), 49% as ‘intermediate risk’ (88.4% 5-year RFS (95%CI 83.6–91.8), n = 261), and 26% as ‘high risk’ (61.1% 5-year RFS (95%CI 51.9–69.1), n = 137). Conclusion: In these two independent European cohorts, the CP-GEP model was able to stratify patients with stage I–II melanoma into two groups differentiated by RFS.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20726694
Volume :
14
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancers
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....534edb90dbec6596687aef55d3524e9a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14122854