Back to Search
Start Over
Use of Laxative-augmented Contrast Medium in the Evaluation of Colorectal Foci at FDG PET
- Source :
- Radiology. 259:525-533
- Publication Year :
- 2011
- Publisher :
- Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), 2011.
-
Abstract
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection of colon lesions with that of delayed PET/computed tomography (CT) performed after the administration of a laxative-augmented contrast medium.All patients gave written informed consent according to the guidelines issued by the institutional review board. In a prospective study performed from November 2005 to December 2006, images obtained in 847 patients were reviewed by two physicians in consensus. Colorectal FDG uptake on initial PET images that exceeded background FDG accumulation was graded as minimal, equivocal, or positive. When the initial PET scan revealed a colorectal region of increased uptake, either oral or anal laxative-augmented contrast medium was administered on the basis of the site of colorectal FDG focus and delayed PET/CT was performed. Initial PET findings were reevaluated and revised when necessary. Comparison was performed on a per-patient basis. Findings at histopathologic analysis and clinical follow-up served as the reference standard. The accuracy of PET was compared with that of PET/CT by using the McNemar test.Colorectal FDG foci were seen on initial images in 137 patients. Uptake on the initial images was reported as minimal in 14 patients, equivocal in 68, and positive in 55. With use of a laxative-augmented contrast medium and delayed PET/CT, the proportions of equivocal and positive results decreased by 84% (57 of 68 patients) and 58% (18 of 31 patients), respectively. The accuracy of delayed PET/CT in the depiction of colorectal cancer was greater than that of initial PET (93.4% [128 of 137 patients] vs 71.5% [98 of 137 patients], respectively; P.01).Delayed PET/CT with laxative-augmented contrast medium is more accurate than initial PET alone in the detection of colorectal cancer. This approach has promise as a tool for guiding decisions about how to treat patients with colorectal FDG foci.http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11101193/-/DC1.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Laxative
Iothalamate Meglumine
Diagnostic accuracy
Citric Acid
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Organometallic Compounds
Humans
Medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
In patient
Prospective Studies
Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Aged, 80 and over
business.industry
Colonoscopy
Middle Aged
Reference Standards
Contrast medium
Laxatives
Positron-Emission Tomography
Female
Radiology
Radiopharmaceuticals
Ct imaging
Colorectal Neoplasms
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
business
Nuclear medicine
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15271315 and 00338419
- Volume :
- 259
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Radiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....52be96b6ec00c1bbd203f18b004492bf
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11101193