Back to Search Start Over

Antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations

Authors :
Nicolas Wentzensen
Katrin Hufnagel
Sally B. Coburn
Gillian S. Wills
Britton Trabert
Alexander J. Mentzer
Annika Idahl
Nicole Brenner
Patricia Hartge
Michael Pawlita
Sarah C Woodhall
Mark E. Sherman
Julia Butt
Beata Peplonska
Tim Waterboer
Louise A. Brinton
Jolanta Lissowska
Federica Inturrisi
APH - Methodology
Source :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 111(2), 129-136. Oxford University Press
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Oxford University Press, 2019.

Abstract

Background: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been associated with ovarian cancer risk. To clarify the role of Chlamydia trachomatis and other infectious agents in the development of ovarian cancer, we evaluated the association of serologic markers with incident ovarian cancer using a staged approach in two independent populations.Methods: Studies included: 1) a case–control study in Poland (244 ovarian cancers/556 control subjects) and 2) a prospective nested case–control study in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial (160 ovarian cancers/159 control subjects). Associations of serologic marker levels with ovarian cancer risk at diagnostic as well as higher thresholds, identified in Poland and independently evaluated in PLCO, were estimated using multivariable adjusted logistic regression.Results: In the Polish study, antibodies (based on laboratory cut-point) against the chlamydia plasmid-encoded Pgp3 protein (serological gold standard) were associated with increased ovarian cancer risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] ¼ 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] ¼ 1.20 to 2.22); when a positive result was redefined at higher levels, ovarian cancer risk was increased (cut-point 2: OR ¼ 2.00, 95% CI ¼ 1.38 to 2.89; cut-point 3 [max OR]: OR ¼ 2.19, 95% CI ¼ 1.29 to 3.73). In the prospective PLCO study, Pgp3 antibodies were associated with elevated risk at the laboratory cut-point (OR ¼ 1.43, 95% CI ¼ 0.78 to 2.63) and more stringent cut-points (cut-point 2: OR ¼ 2.25, 95% CI ¼ 1.07 to 4.71); cut-point 3: OR ¼ 2.53, 95% CI ¼ 0.63 to 10.08). In both studies, antibodies against other infectious agents measured were not associated with risk.Conclusions: In two independent populations, antibodies against prior/current C. trachomatis (Pgp3) were associated with a doubling in ovarian cancer risk, whereas markers of other infectious agents were unrelated. These findings lend support for an association between PID and ovarian cancer.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00278874
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 111(2), 129-136. Oxford University Press
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....520784fdf24cb2c18d33505dfa41dad4