Back to Search Start Over

Long-term growth and alignment after occipitocervical and atlantoaxial fusion with rigid internal fixation in young children

Authors :
Benjamin C. Kennedy
Randy S. D’Amico
Brett E. Youngerman
Michael M. McDowell
Kristopher G. Hooten
Daniel Couture
Andrew Jea
Jeffrey Leonard
Sean M. Lew
David W. Pincus
Luis Rodriguez
Gerald F. Tuite
Michael L. Diluna
Douglas L. Brockmeyer
Richard C. E. Anderson
Source :
Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 17:94-102
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), 2016.

Abstract

OBJECTThe long-term consequences of atlantoaxial (AA) and occipitocervical (OC) fusion and instrumentation in young children are unknown. Anecdotal reports have raised concerns regarding altered growth and alignment of the cervical spine after surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term effects of these surgeries on the growth and alignment of the maturing spine.METHODSA multiinstitutional retrospective chart review was conducted for patients less than or equal to 6 years of age who underwent OC or AA fusion with rigid instrumentation at 9 participating centers. All patients had at least 3 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up data and radiographically confirmed fusion. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and most recent follow-up radiographs and/or CT scans were evaluated to assess changes in spinal growth and alignment.RESULTSForty children (9 who underwent AA fusion and 31 who underwent OC fusion) were included in the study (mean follow-up duration 56 months). The mean vertical growth over the fused levels in the AA fusion patients represented 30% of the growth of the cervical spine (range 10%–50%). Three different vertical growth patterns of the fusion construct developed among the 31 OC fusion patients during the follow-up period: 1) 16 patients had substantial growth (13%–46% of the total growth of the cervical spine); 2) 9 patients had no meaningful growth; and 3) 6 patients, most of whom presented with a distracted atlantooccipital dislocation, had a decrease in the height of the fused levels (range 7–23 mm). Regarding spinal alignment, 85% (34/40) of the patients had good alignment at follow-up, with straight or mildly lordotic cervical curvatures. In 1 AA fusion patient (11%) and 5 OC fusion patients (16%), we observed new hyperlordosis (range 43°–62°). There were no cases of new kyphosis or swan-neck deformity, evidence of subaxial instability, or unintended subaxial fusion. No preoperative predictors of these growth patterns or alignment were evident.CONCLUSIONSThese results demonstrate that most young children undergoing AA and OC fusion with rigid internal fixation continue to have good cervical alignment and continued growth within the fused levels during a prolonged follow-up period. However, some variability in vertical growth and alignment exists, highlighting the need to continue close long-term follow-up.

Details

ISSN :
19330715 and 19330707
Volume :
17
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....51ef29b589653d222e440c8bac3bda46
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.peds14728