Back to Search
Start Over
Multicenter randomized comparison of direct vs. conventional stenting: The DIRECTO trial
- Source :
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 58:434-440
- Publication Year :
- 2003
- Publisher :
- Wiley, 2003.
-
Abstract
- With conventional stenting, predilatation frequently induces dissections that require deploying stents longer than originally planned. To assess whether direct stenting is safe and may prevent dissections and reduce the length of stents implanted, we conducted a randomized study comparing direct (n = 73) and conventional (n = 78) stenting. Direct stenting was successful in 89% of cases, 11% crossed over to predilation without complications. Dissections occurred more frequently in conventional stenting group (10.3% vs. 1.4%; P = 0.034), but did not translate to a significant stent length difference (16.31 ± 7.6 vs. 15.31 ± 5.5; P = NS). Periprocedure creatine kinase elevation and number of balloons utilized were lower with direct stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;58:434–440. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Coronary Disease
Coronary Angiography
Risk Assessment
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Catheterization
law.invention
Coronary Restenosis
Randomized controlled trial
law
Angioplasty
Confidence Intervals
medicine
Humans
Direct stenting
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Prospective Studies
cardiovascular diseases
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
Vascular Patency
Aged
Probability
biology
business.industry
Follow up studies
Stent
General Medicine
Length of Stay
Middle Aged
equipment and supplies
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
surgical procedures, operative
biology.protein
Female
Stents
Creatine kinase
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Follow-Up Studies
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1522726X and 15221946
- Volume :
- 58
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....51da79d9123f1fad426791905f9737d0
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10404