Back to Search Start Over

Coexistent bicuspid aortic valve and mitral valve prolapse: epidemiology, phenotypic spectrum, and clinical implications

Authors :
Hartzell V. Schaff
Hector I. Michelena
Sorin V. Pislaru
Rakesh M. Suri
Joseph F. Maalouf
Simon Maltais
Vuyisile T. Nkomo
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Sunil Mankad
Ratnasari Padang
Source :
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. 20:677-686
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2018.

Abstract

AIMS Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and mitral valve prolapse (MVP) are common but the prevalence and significance of coexistent conditions are unknown. This study investigated the prevalence, phenotypic expression, and clinical significance of coexistent MVP-BAV. METHODS AND RESULTS Retrospective comparison of MVP-BAV and MVP-tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) prevalence including de novo echocardiographic analysis of all MVP-BAV patients between 2005 and 2015 was performed. The community prevalence of MVP-BAV was 2.7% vs. 3.4% for MVP-TAV (P = 0.45). Posterior mitral leaflet (PML)-MVP was the most common phenotype in both BAV and TAV (P = 0.38), but anterior mitral leaflet (AML)-MVP was twice more prevalent in BAV (31% vs. 15%, P

Details

ISSN :
20472412 and 20472404
Volume :
20
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....519c2b2b12e30ec6e29981f414a15ab7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey166