Back to Search Start Over

18F-FDG micro-PET/CT for intra-operative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery

Authors :
Mieke Van Bockstal
Radoslaw Marcinkowski
Jo Van Dorpe
Vincent Keereman
Roel Van Holen
Stefaan Vandenberghe
M. Göker
Herman Depypere
Rudy Van den Broecke
Boudewijn Brans
UCL - SSS/IREC/SLUC - Pôle St.-Luc
UCL - (SLuc) Service d'anatomie pathologique
Source :
Acta chirurgica Belgica, Vol. 120, no.5, p. 366-374 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited, 2020.

Abstract

RATIONALE: Positive surgical margins for invasive breast cancer (BC) treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are defined as ink on tumor. The rate of positive margins is approximately 20%, since a time- and cost-effective method for margin assessment is lacking. In this study, we investigated margin status by intra-operative imaging using high-resolution 18 F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and X-ray computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Twenty patients were enrolled and received 4 MBq/kg of FDG prior to surgery. Intra-operative imaging of the specimens was performed by the MOLECUBES β-CUBE (PET) and X-CUBE (CT). Margin status was assessed by three surgeons and compared with an algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using histopathological assessment as a gold standard. RESULTS: A region with high FDG uptake was visualized in all specimens. Automated analysis showed a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 60%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 after ROC analysis. Margin assessment by the surgeons resulted in a mean sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 72%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that high-resolution FDG-PET/CT can facilitate intra-operative margin assessment during BCS. This technique achieves good sensitivity and specificity and may therefore reduce re-operation rates in the future.

Details

ISSN :
00015458
Volume :
120
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....51808d9439f10d031d42d26c53d4aba6