Back to Search
Start Over
Targeting rehabilitation to improve outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in patients at risk of poor outcomes: randomised controlled trial
- Source :
- The BMJ, 2020, ' Targeting rehabilitation to improve outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in patients at risk of poor outcomes : randomised controlled trial ', BMJ (Clinical research ed.), vol. 371, pp. m3576 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3576
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- BMJ Publishing Group, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Objective To evaluate whether a progressive course of outpatient physiotherapy offers superior outcomes to a single physiotherapy review and home exercise based intervention when targeted at patients with a predicted poor outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Design Parallel group randomised controlled trial. Setting 13 secondary and tertiary care centres in the UK providing postoperative physiotherapy. Participants 334 participants with knee osteoarthritis who were defined as at risk of a poor outcome after total knee arthroplasty, based on the Oxford knee score, at six weeks postoperatively. 163 were allocated to therapist led outpatient rehabilitation and 171 to a home exercise based protocol. Interventions All participants were reviewed by a physiotherapist and commenced 18 sessions of rehabilitation over six weeks, either as therapist led outpatient rehabilitation (progressive goal oriented functional rehabilitation protocol, modified weekly in one-one contact sessions) or as physiotherapy review followed by a home exercise based regimen (without progressive input from a physiotherapist). Main outcome measures Primary outcome was Oxford knee score at 52 weeks, with a 4 point difference between groups considered to be clinically meaningful. Secondary outcomes included additional patient reported outcome measures of pain and function at 14, 26, and 52 weeks post-surgery. Results 334 patients were randomised. Eight were lost to follow-up. Intervention compliance was more than 85%. The between group difference in Oxford knee score at 52 weeks was 1.91 (95% confidence interval −0.18 to 3.99) points, favouring the outpatient rehabilitation arm (P=0.07). When all time point data were analysed, the between group difference in Oxford knee score was a non-clinically meaningful 2.25 points (0.61 to 3.90, P=0.01). No between group differences were found for secondary outcomes of average pain (0.25 points, −0.78 to 0.28, P=0.36) or worst pain (0.22 points, −0.71 to 0.41, P=0.50) at 52 weeks or earlier time points, or of satisfaction with outcome (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.62, P=0.75) or post-intervention function (4.64 seconds, 95% confidence interval −14.25 to 4.96, P=0.34). Conclusions Outpatient therapist led rehabilitation was not superior to a single physiotherapist review and home exercise based regimen in patients at risk of poor outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. No clinically relevant differences were observed across primary or secondary outcome measures. Trials registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23357609 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01849445 .
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Knee Joint
medicine.medical_treatment
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
Clinical Protocols
law
medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Physical Therapy Modalities
Aged
Pain Measurement
030203 arthritis & rheumatology
Pain, Postoperative
Rehabilitation
business.industry
Research
General Medicine
Odds ratio
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Arthroplasty
Confidence interval
Exercise Therapy
Regimen
Treatment Outcome
Physical therapy
Patient Compliance
Patient-reported outcome
Female
business
Oxford knee score
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09598138
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The BMJ, 2020, ' Targeting rehabilitation to improve outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in patients at risk of poor outcomes : randomised controlled trial ', BMJ (Clinical research ed.), vol. 371, pp. m3576 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3576
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....50d627b13ee02db595b5f77496a27ba6
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3576