Back to Search Start Over

Liver fibrosis: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL)

Authors :
Massimo Pinzani
Reda Elwakil
Amr Fateen
Ashraf Omar
Ayman Yousry
Gamal Esmat
Saeed Hamid
Taher Elzanaty
Masao Omata
Yogesh Chawla
Alaa Ibrahim
Wasim Jafri
Abdelkhalek Hamed
Hassan Hamdy
Laurentius A. Lesmana
Shiv Kumar Sarin
Nurdan Tözün
Ahmed Abdallah
Chun-Tao Wai
Mohsen Salama
Nancy Leung
Sherif Mogawer
Gamal Shiha
Pierre Bedossa
Imam Waked
Hitoshi Maruyama
Wahed Doss
Ahmed Medhat Nasr
Puja Sakhuja
Ashok Kumar
Medhat Elsahar
Source :
Hepatology International. 3:323-333
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2008.

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a common pathway leading to cirrhosis, which is the final result of injury to the liver. Accurate assessment of the degree of fibrosis is important clinically, especially when treatments aimed at reversing fibrosis are being evolved. Liver biopsy has been considered to be the “gold standard” to assess fibrosis. However, liver biopsy being invasive and, in many instances, not favored by patients or physicians, alternative approaches to assess liver fibrosis have assumed great importance. Moreover, therapies aimed at reversing the liver fibrosis have also been tried lately with variable results. Till now, there has been no consensus on various clinical, pathological, and radiological aspects of liver fibrosis. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver set up a working party on liver fibrosis in 2007, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of liver fibrosis relevant to disease patterns and clinical practice in the Asia-Pacific region. The process for the development of these consensus guidelines involved the following: review of all available published literature by a core group of experts; proposal of consensus statements by the experts; discussion of the contentious issues; and unanimous approval of the consensus statements after discussion. The Oxford System of evidence-based approach was adopted for developing the consensus statements using the level of evidence from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest) and grade of recommendation from A (strongest) to D (weakest). The consensus statements are presented in this review.

Details

ISSN :
19360541 and 19360533
Volume :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Hepatology International
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4fcdeaa586e2976df0c90530b16e0a79
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-008-9114-x