Back to Search
Start Over
Centralization of High-Risk Cancer Surgery Within Existing Hospital Systems
- Source :
- J Clin Oncol
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2019.
-
Abstract
- PURPOSE Centralization is often proposed as a strategy to improve the quality of certain high-risk health care services. We evaluated the extent to which existing hospital systems centralize high-risk cancer surgery and whether centralization is associated with short-term clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We merged data from the American Hospital Association’s annual survey on hospital system affiliation with Medicare claims to identify patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic, esophageal, colon, lung, or rectal cancer between 2005 and 2014. We calculated the degree to which systems centralized each procedure by calculating the annual proportion of surgeries performed at the highest-volume hospital within each system. We then estimated the independent effect of centralization on the incidence of postoperative complications, death, and readmissions after accounting for patient, hospital, and system characteristics. RESULTS The average degree of centralization varied from 25.2% (range, 6.6% to 100%) for colectomy to 71.2% (range, 8.3% to 100%) for pancreatectomy. Greater centralization was associated with lower rates of postoperative complications and death for lung resection, esophagectomy, and pancreatectomy. For example, there was a 1.1% (95% CI, 0.8% to 1.4%) absolute reduction in 30-day mortality after pancreatectomy for each 20% increase in the degree of centralization within systems. Independent of volume and hospital quality, postoperative mortality for pancreatectomy was two times higher in the least centralized systems than in the most centralized systems (8.9% v 3.7%, P < .01). Centralization was not associated with better outcomes for colectomy or proctectomy. CONCLUSION Greater centralization of complex cancer surgery within existing hospital systems was associated with better outcomes. As hospitals affiliate in response to broader financial and organization pressures, these systems may also present unique opportunities to improve the quality of high-risk cancer care.
- Subjects :
- Male
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors
Databases, Factual
media_common.quotation_subject
MEDLINE
Medicare
Risk Assessment
03 medical and health sciences
Postoperative Complications
0302 clinical medicine
Risk Factors
Neoplasms
Oncology Service, Hospital
Health care
medicine
Humans
Quality (business)
030212 general & internal medicine
Intensive care medicine
Aged
Quality Indicators, Health Care
media_common
Aged, 80 and over
Extramural
business.industry
High-risk cancer
ORIGINAL REPORTS
Neoplasms surgery
Quality Improvement
United States
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Surgical Oncology
Treatment Outcome
Oncology
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Webcast
Centralized Hospital Services
Female
Risk assessment
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15277755 and 0732183X
- Volume :
- 37
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....4fb89f9b7ffbcf062b4fedb2e3785bdc
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.18.02035