Back to Search Start Over

Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge

Authors :
Nathalie G. Munier-Jolain
Thierry Doré
Marc Tchamitchian
Pablo Tittonell
David Makowski
Eric Malézieux
Agronomie
AgroParisTech-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Fonctionnement agroécologique et performances des systèmes de cultures horticoles (Cirad-Persyst-UPR 103 HORTSYS)
Département Performances des systèmes de production et de transformation tropicaux (Cirad-PERSYST)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)
Agroécologie [Dijon]
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Bourgogne (UB)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement
Unité de recherche d'Écodéveloppement (ECODEVELOPPEMENT)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Systèmes de Cultures Annuelles (UPR 102 SCA)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AgroParisTech
Fonctionnement agroécologique et performances des systèmes de cultures horticoles (UPR HORTSYS)
FLAveur, VIsion et Comportement du consommateur (FLAVIC)
Etablissement National d'Enseignement Supérieur Agronomique de Dijon (ENESAD)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Bourgogne (UB)
Systèmes de Cultures Annuelles (UPR SCA)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ) -AgroParisTech
UR HortSys
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ) -Université de Bourgogne ( UB ) -AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement
Unité de recherche d'Écodéveloppement ( ECODEVELOPPEMENT )
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA )
CIRAD-PERSYST Systèmes de Cultures Annuels
Source :
European Journal of Agronomy, European Journal of Agronomy, Elsevier, 2011, 34 (4), ⟨10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006⟩, European Journal of Agronomy, Elsevier, 2011, 34 (4), pp.197-210. ⟨10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006⟩, European Journal of Agronomy 4 (34), 197-210. (2011), European Journal of Agronomy, Elsevier, 2011, 34 (4), 〈10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006〉
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2011.

Abstract

International audience; Agriculture is facing up to an increasing number of challenges, including the need to ensure various ecosystem services and to resolve apparent conflicts between them. One of the ways forward for agriculture currently being debated is a set of principles grouped together under the umbrella term “ecological intensification”. In published studies, ecological intensification has generally been considered to be based essentially on the use of biological regulation to manage agroecosystems, at field, farm and landscape scales. We propose here five additional avenues that agronomic research could follow to strengthen the ecological intensification of current farming systems. We begin by assuming that progress in plant sciences over the last two decades provides new insight of potential use to agronomists. Potentially useful new developments in plant science include advances in the fields of energy conversion by plants, nitrogen use efficiency and defence mechanisms against pests. We then suggest that natural ecosystems may also provide sources of inspiration for cropping system design, in terms of their structure and function on the one hand, and farmers’ knowledge on the other. Natural ecosystems display a number of interesting properties that could be incorporated into agroecosystems. We discuss the value and limitations of attempting to 'mimic' their structure and function, while considering the differences in objectives and constraints between these two types of system. Farmers develop extensive knowledge of the systems they manage. We discuss ways in which this knowledge could be combined with, or fed into scientific knowledge and innovation, and the extent to which this is likely to be possible. The two remaining avenues concern methods. We suggest that agronomists make more use of meta-analysis and comparative system studies, these two types of methods being commonly used in other disciplines but barely used in agronomy. Meta-analysis would make it possible to quantify variations of cropping system performances in interaction with soil and climate conditions more accurately across environments and socio-economic contexts. Comparative analysis would help to identify the structural characteristics of cropping and farming systems underlying properties of interest. Such analysis can be performed with sets of performance indicators and methods borrowed from ecology for analyses of the structure and organisation of these systems. These five approaches should make it possible to deepen our knowledge of agroecosystems for action.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
11610301
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Agronomy, European Journal of Agronomy, Elsevier, 2011, 34 (4), ⟨10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006⟩, European Journal of Agronomy, Elsevier, 2011, 34 (4), pp.197-210. ⟨10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006⟩, European Journal of Agronomy 4 (34), 197-210. (2011), European Journal of Agronomy, Elsevier, 2011, 34 (4), 〈10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006〉
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4e8a19d13d9c6f19a35c923d9587741c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006⟩