Back to Search Start Over

Percutaneous approaches for retrieval of an embolized or malpositioned left atrial appendage closure device: A multicenter experience

Authors :
Thomas Haldis
Muhammad R. Afzal
Apoor Patel
Steven J. Yakubov
Christopher R. Ellis
Roy M. John
Zaher Fanari
Anish K. Amin
David B. Delurgio
Jeffrey A. Goldstein
John D. Hummel
James Gabriels
Emile G. Daoud
Mikhael F. El-Chami
Source :
Heart Rhythm. 17:1545-1553
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Background Experience with retrieval of a Watchman left atrial (LA) appendage (LAA) closure device (WD) is limited. An embolized or grossly malpositioned WD warrants retrieval to minimize the risk of thromboembolic complications and vascular occlusion. Objective The purpose of this study was to report approaches for percutaneous retrieval of a WD from multicenter experience. Methods Data on successful WD retrievals were obtained from high-volume operators. Data included clinical characteristics; structural characteristics of the LA and LAA; and procedural details of the deployment and retrieval procedure, type of retrieval (immediate: during the same procedure; delayed: during a separate procedure after the successful deployment), equipment used, complications, and postretrieval management. Results Ten successful percutaneous and 1 surgical retrievals comprised this study. Seven patients had immediate retrieval, while 4 had delayed retrieval. The median duration before delayed retrieval was 45 days (range 1–45 days). The median LAA diameter and size of a successfully deployed WD was 16 mm (range 14–24 mm) and 21 mm (range 21–30 mm), respectively. A WD was retrieved from the LA (n = 1), LAA (n = 2), left ventricle (n = 2), and aorta (n = 6). The reason for retrieval from the LAA was inadequate deployment, resulting in a significant peri-device leak. Retrieval from the LA or LAA was successfully performed using snares (n = 2) and a Raptor grasping device (n = 1). Retrieval from the left ventricle was achieved with a snare (n = 1) and surgery (n = 1). Retrieval from the aorta required snares (n = 5) and retrieval forceps (n = 1). Five patients were successfully reimplanted with a larger size WD. The only complication during percutaneous retrieval was a pseudoaneurysm. Conclusion Retrieval of an embolized or malpositioned WD is feasible, and familiarity with snares and grasping tools can facilitate a successful removal.

Details

ISSN :
15475271
Volume :
17
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Heart Rhythm
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4e6910d8af5b6f88046b1008cdb44ed4