Determining and Comparing the Effective Lens Position and Refractive Outcome of a Novel Rhexis-Fixated Lens to Established Lens Designs

WE sought to evaluate differences in effective lens position (ELP) based on the lens design. Intraocular lenses (IOLs) with plate-haptic, c-loop haptic, and a rhexis-fixated lens were compared.Retrospective, multicenter, comparative case series.The study included patients having age-related cataract surgery with implantation of either a plate-haptic, c-loop haptic, or a novel rhexis-fixated IOL. Biometry and refraction measurements were conducted preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Lens constant optimization was performed.Seventy eyes of 56 subjects were included. ELP for rhexis-fixated IOL was shortest (4.29 ± 0.24 mm), followed by c-loop haptic (4.41 ± 0.42 mm) and plate-haptic (4.51 ± 0.26 mm) IOL. Difference in ELP was significant between rhexis-fixated IOL and both plate-haptic (P = .001) and c-loop haptic IOL (P = .000). Anterior chamber depth adjustment based on lens design showed a significant effect on refraction and IOL power predictions for all formulas and lenses (P.05). For the rhexis-fixated IOL the differences in refraction ranged from -0.039 diopters (D) for the Hill-Radial Basis Function to -0.096 D for Haigis. The other 2 lenses showed mean differences in refraction between +0.046 D for Hill-Radial Basis Function and +0.097 D for Haigis.The difference in IOL fixation and its resulting position in the capsular bag have a significant effect on the effective lens position and consequently a significant effect on the prediction of postoperative refraction.