Cite
Meta-Analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fractional-Flow-Reserve- and Angiography-Guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
MLA
Connor Jack Matthews, et al. “Meta-Analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fractional-Flow-Reserve- and Angiography-Guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 184, Dec. 2022, pp. 160–62. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.041.
APA
Connor Jack Matthews, Kate Naylor, Jonathan Mark Blaxill, John Pierre Greenwood, Abdul Moheet Mozid, Jennifer Ann Rossington, Murugapathy Veerasamy, Stephen Bentley Wheatcroft, & Heerajnarain Bulluck. (2022). Meta-Analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fractional-Flow-Reserve- and Angiography-Guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The American Journal of Cardiology, 184, 160–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.041
Chicago
Connor Jack Matthews, Kate Naylor, Jonathan Mark Blaxill, John Pierre Greenwood, Abdul Moheet Mozid, Jennifer Ann Rossington, Murugapathy Veerasamy, Stephen Bentley Wheatcroft, and Heerajnarain Bulluck. 2022. “Meta-Analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fractional-Flow-Reserve- and Angiography-Guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.” The American Journal of Cardiology 184 (December): 160–62. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.041.