Back to Search Start Over

A Question Prompt List for Advanced Cancer Patients Promoting Advance Care Planning: A French Randomized Trial

Authors :
Paul Cottu
Sylvie Dolbeault
Marion Chevrier
Evelyne Renault-Tessier
Phillipe Poulain
Alexia Savignoni
Carole Bouleuc
Jean-Yves Pierga
Gisèle Chvetzoff
Anne Brédart
Laure Copel
Alexis Burnod
Institut Curie [Paris]
Polyclinique de l'Ormeau
Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon
Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Paul Brousse-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris-Saclay
11.350, DR-2012-121 Institut National Du Cancer, INCa: 20100728, NCT02854293
The authors thank three psychologists, Carine Fouquet, Christ?le Richard, and Floriane Claustre, for their help in the transcription and the coding of the consultations. This work was supported by the Institut National du Cancer INCA (grant Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 20100728). Registered trial number: NCT02854293. Ethical approval: Ethical approval was obtained by the Institutional Review Board (Commission Nationale Informatique et Libert?s DR-2012-121 and Comit? Consultatif sur le Traitement de l'Information en mati?re de Recherche dans le domaine de la Sant? 11.350bis).
Source :
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Elsevier, 2021, 61 (2), pp.331-341.e8. ⟨10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.026⟩
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Context Advance care planning is essential to enable informed medical decisions to be made and to reduce aggressiveness in end-of-life (EOL) care. Objectives This study aimed to explore whether a question prompt list (QPL) adapted to French language and culture could promote discussions, particularly on prognosis and EOL issues, among advanced cancer patients attending outpatient palliative care (PC) consultations. Methods In this multicenter randomized study, patients assigned to the intervention arm received a QPL to help them prepare for the next consultation one month later. The main inclusion criteria were advanced cancer patients referred to the PC team with an estimated life expectancy of less than one year. The primary endpoint was the number of questions raised, globally and by topic. The secondary objectives were the impact of the QPL on psychological symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and coping styles at two months. Results Patients (n = 71) in the QPL arm asked more questions (mean 21.8 vs. 18.2, P = 0.03) than patients in the control arm (n = 71), particularly on PC (5.6 vs. 3.7, P = 0.012) and EOL issues (2.2 vs. 1, P = 0.018) but not on prognosis (4.3 vs. 3.6, not specified). At two months, there was no change in anxiety, depression, or quality of life in either arm; patient satisfaction with doctors' technical skills was scored higher (P = 0.024), and avoidance coping responses were less frequent (self-distraction, P = 0.015; behavioral disengagement, P = 0.025) in the QPL arm. Conclusion Questions on PC and EOL issues in outpatient PC consultations were more frequent, and patient satisfaction was better when a QPL was made available before the consultation.

Details

ISSN :
08853924
Volume :
61
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4d65d9f9cebf818e8f6a5f67fe3ff9ae
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.026