Modern Perioperative Practices May Mitigate Effects of Continued Smoking Among Lung Cancer Patients

Background Although smokers are at an increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery, the relationship between cessation timing and postoperative pulmonary complications has not been explored in an era of enhanced recovery protocols and active tobacco cessation programs. Because a strong preference exists among thoracic surgeons to delay surgery to continued smokers, we sought to evaluate this relationship in a modern era. Methods Patients undergoing lung resection for a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer from 2012 to 2017 were identified. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate preoperative tobacco cessation timing to determine the impact on postoperative pulmonary complications. Results In all, 1038 ever smokers were identified. Patients were current smokers in 30 (3%) instances, and among former smokers, the preoperative cessation interval was 0 to 14 days in 10% (104), more than 14 days to 1 month in 6% (62), more than 1 month to 1 year in 18% (189), more than 1 to 5 years in 10% (107), and more than 5 years in 53% (546). Pulmonary complications occurred in 269 patients (26%). Multivariable analysis revealed that no group of recent or long-term quitters had superior outcomes in terms of pulmonary complications when evaluating various periods of abstinence in comparison with continued smokers and active quitters. Conclusions In an era of enhanced recovery protocols, minimally invasive surgery, and active tobacco cessation programs that may help patients to cut back, our data do not support the practice of delaying or denying surgery to patients who have difficulty quitting completely. Perioperative cessation counseling should be aimed at long-term benefits, including reduction of disease recurrence and secondary malignancies.