Back to Search Start Over

Assessing the quality of ionospheric models through GNSS positioning error: methodology and results

Authors :
Adria Rovira-Garcia
José Miguel Juan
Deimos Ibáñez-Segura
Guillermo González-Casado
Raul Orus-Perez
Jaume Sanz
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Física
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Doctorat en Ciència i Tecnologia Aeroespacials
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Matemàtiques
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. gAGE - Grup d'Astronomia i Geomàtica
Source :
UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), GPS Solutions, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Single-frequency users of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) must correct for the ionospheric delay. These corrections are available from global ionospheric models (GIMs). Therefore, the accuracy of the GIM is important because the unmodeled or incorrectly part of ionospheric delay contributes to the positioning error of GNSS-based positioning. However, the positioning error of receivers located at known coordinates can be used to infer the accuracy of GIMs in a simple manner. This is why assessment of GIMs by means of the position domain is often used as an alternative to assessments in the ionospheric delay domain. The latter method requires accurate reference ionospheric values obtained from a network solution and complex geodetic modeling. However, evaluations using the positioning error method present several difficulties, as evidenced in recent works, that can lead to inconsistent results compared to the tests using the ionospheric delay domain. We analyze the reasons why such inconsistencies occur, applying both methodologies. We have computed the position of 34 permanent stations for the entire year of 2014 within the last Solar Maximum. The positioning tests have been done using code pseudoranges and carrier-phase leveled (CCL) measurements. We identify the error sources that make it difficult to distinguish the part of the positioning error that is attributable to the ionospheric correction: the measurement noise, pseudorange multipath, evaluation metric, and outliers. Once these error sources are considered, we obtain equivalent results to those found in the ionospheric delay domain assessments. Accurate GIMs can provide single-frequency navigation positioning at the decimeter level using CCL measurements and better positions than those obtained using the dual-frequency ionospheric-free combination of pseudoranges. Finally, some recommendations are provided for further studies of ionospheric models using the position domain method.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), GPS Solutions, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4bc91bee59dc95bbdb26bab750934e11