Diffuse mesothelioma of the peritoneum: a pathological study of 64 tumours treated with cytoreductive therapy

Summary Background Diffuse peritoneal mesothelioma (DPM) forms a spectrum of indolent surface tumours to malignant invasive cancers. There are few pathological series that span well and poorly differentiated lesions that show diffuse peritoneal spread. Methods Sixty-four DPM treated by initial cytoreductive therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Tumours were classified by surface and invasive growth pattern and correlated with riskfactors, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction (CCR). Degree of invasion was quantitated as absent (0), into stroma (I), into fat (II), and into adjacent structures (III) and was correlated with cytological features. Selected immunohistochemical stains were performed. Results There were three well differentiated papillary mesotheliomas (WDPM; type A), four multicystic mesothelioma (type B), 22 tubulopapillary epithelioid mesotheliomas (type C), and 35 poorly differentiated epithelioid mesotheliomas with solid or sarcomatoid growth (Type D). Seven type D tumours had prominent sarcomatoid areas, 12 deciduoid areas, and four lymphohistiocytoid features. Risk factors were present in all groups except type A, and included prior abdominal surgery ( n = 24), asbestos exposure ( n = 5) and radiation ( n = 2). Extra-pleural mesothelioma was present in all groups except type B (total n — 7, 11%). Two type A and eight type C tumours lacked invasion; only type D showed level III invasion. The invasive portion of one type A tumour and two type B tumours showed adenomatoid features. PCI and CCR were greater in type D compared to the other groups ( p— 0.02), as well as mitotic rate, degree of necrosis, and nuclear pleomorphism ( p 0.001). Degree of invasion was strongly correlated with CCR (p — 0.007), necrosis ( p 0.0001), nuclear grade ( p 0.0001), and mitotic rate (p — 0.001), but not PCI (p — 0.1). Immuno- histochemical results were similar across groups, with frequent positivity for CA125 (94%), EGFR (94%) and calretinin (93%), followed by p16 (85%), cytokeratin 5,6 (76%), D2-40 (71%) and WT-1 (47%). PAX-8 was negative in all tumours, except one type A tumour that showed diffuse nuclear positivity. Conclusions Diffuse peritoneal mesotheliomas can be classified into four groups that reflect invasive potential, degree of adverse histological features, and amenability for CCR. Noninvasive tumours include both type A and type C tumours.