Back to Search Start Over

A Survey on Voiding Complaints in Women Presenting at a Pelvic Care Center

Authors :
Kevin Rademakers
Bary Berghmans
Gommert van Koeveringe
Heidi F. A. Moossdorff-Steinhauser
Fred H. M. Nieman
Promovendi PHPC
Epidemiologie
RS: CAPHRI - R3 - Functioning, Participating and Rehabilitation
MUMC+: MA AIOS Urologie (9)
MUMC+: MA Urologie (3)
Urologie
MUMC+: MA Urologie (9)
RS: MHeNs - R3 - Neuroscience
MUMC+: CCZ Urologie Pelvic Care (9)
Source :
Current Urology, 13(1), 31-36. S. Karger AG
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
S. Karger AG, 2019.

Abstract

Introduction: This article reports the prevalence of self-reported voiding complaints and the relationship with other pelvic floor and bladder dysfunctions (PFD).Materials and Methods: Women with a variety of PFDs were referred to the pelvic care center. A standardised questionnaire on 6 PFDs was used. Frequencies of patient characteristics, PFDs and voiding complaints were calculated. Cross tabulation was used to investigate correlations and Pearson correlation coefficients to reveal the strength of the association between PFDs and self-reported voiding complaints.Results: Data of 4470 women were included. Prevalence of (self-reported) voiding Lower urinary tract symptoms was 59.5%. Incomplete bladder emptying is the most prevalent voiding complaint. Self-reported voiding complaints are weakly correlated to age (r = 0.15, p < 0.01) and have moderate correlation with self-reported recurrent urinary tract infections (r = 0.34, p < 0.01), pelvic floor, bladder and bowel complaints. However, the correlation between the feeling of incomplete bladder emptying and the presence of recurrent urinary tract infections is weak (r = 0.06, p = 0.02).Conclusion: Voiding complaints have a high prevalence and symptom bother in women visiting a pelvic care center.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16617657 and 16617649
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Current Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4aeeb2c763c40c1a27f842003c70fc71
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000499297