Back to Search Start Over

Arthroscopic Outcomes as a Function of Acetabular Coverage From a Large Hip Arthroscopy Study Group

Authors :
Andrew B. Wolff
Benjamin R. Kivlan
Shane J. Nho
Thomas J. Ellis
Dominic S. Carreira
John J. Christoforetti
John P. Salvo
Dean K. Matsuda
Source :
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 35:2338-2345
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

To report comparative hip arthroscopic outcomes of patients with low (borderline dysplasia), normal, and high (global pincer femoroacetabular impingement [FAI]) lateral acetabular coverage.A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter registry was performed. Primary hip arthroscopy patients were assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on preoperative lateral center-edge angle: borderline dysplasia (≤25°), normal (25.1°-38.9°), and pincer (≥39°). Repeated-measures analysis of variance compared preoperative with 2-year minimum postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) scores. Subsequent analysis of variance determined the effect of acetabular coverage on magnitude of change in scores.Of 437 patients, the only statistical difference between groups was a lower prevalence of acetabuloplasty in the borderline dysplasia group (P = .001). A significant improvement in the preoperative to postoperative iHOT-12 scores for patients with normal acetabular coverage, acetabular undercoverage, and acetabular overcoverage was observed: F(1, 339) = 311.06; P.001, with no statistical differences in preoperative (P = .505) and postoperative (P.488) iHOT-12 scores when comparing the groups based on acetabular coverage. Mean iHOT-12 scores increased from 37.3 preoperatively to 68.7 postoperatively (P.001) in the borderline dysplasia group, from 34.4 to 72 (P.001) in the normal coverage group, and from 35.3 to 69.4 (P.001) in the pincer group. These preoperative scores increased by 31.4, 37.8, and 34.1, respectively, with no effect for acetabular coverage on the magnitude of change from preoperative to postoperative iHOT-12 scores: F(2,339) = 1.18; P = .310. Ten patients (2.3%) underwent conversion arthroplasty, and 19 patients (4.4%) underwent revision arthroscopy with no significant effect of acetabular coverage on the incidence of revision or conversion surgery: χLateral acetabular coverage did not influence outcomes from primary hip arthroscopy when performed in patients with low (borderline dysplasia), normal, and high (global pincer FAI) lateral center-edge angle. Borderline dysplasia and moderate global pincer FAI with no or minimal osteoarthritis do not compromise successful 2-year minimum outcomes or survivorship following primary hip arthroscopy when performed by experienced surgeons.Level III, retrospective therapeutic trial.

Details

ISSN :
07498063
Volume :
35
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4aadf6da42fb67b46324ce79119ab9af