Back to Search
Start Over
Identifying patient values impacting the decision whether to participate in early phase clinical cancer trials: A systematic review
- Source :
- Cancer Treatment Reviews, 98, Cancer Treatment Reviews, 98:102217. W.B. Saunders Ltd, Cancer Treatment Reviews, 98:102217. W.B. Saunders
- Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Contains fulltext : 235017.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: For many patients with advanced cancer, the decision whether to participate in early phase clinical trials or not is complex. The decision-making process requires an in-depth discussion of patient values. We therefore aimed to synthesize and describe patient values that may affect early phase clinical trial participation. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in seven electronic databases on patient values in relation to patients' decisions to participate in early phase clinical cancer trials. RESULTS: From 3072 retrieved articles, eleven quantitative and five qualitative studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We extracted ten patient values that can contribute to patients' decisions. Overall, patients who seek trial participation usually report hope, trust, quantity of life, altruism, perseverance, faith and/or risk tolerance as important values. Quality of life and humanity are main values of patients who refuse trial participation. Autonomy and social adherence can be reported by both trial seekers or refusers, dependent upon how they are manifested in a patient. CONCLUSIONS: We identified patient values that frequently play a role in the decision-making process. In the setting of discussing early phase clinical trial participation with patients, healthcare professionals need to be aware of these values. This analysis supports the importance of individual exploration of values. Patients that become aware of their values, e.g. by means of interventions focused on clarifying their values, could feel more empowered to choose. Subsequently, healthcare professionals could improve their support in a patients' decision-making process and reduce the chance of decisional conflict.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
medicine.medical_specialty
Decision Making
Psychological intervention
Decisional conflict
Choice Behavior
Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18]
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Quality of life (healthcare)
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Informed consent
Neoplasms
medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Clinical Trials as Topic
business.industry
General Medicine
Clinical trial
Identified patient
030104 developmental biology
Oncology
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Family medicine
Value of life
Patient Participation
business
Qualitative research
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 03057372
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Cancer Treatment Reviews, 98, Cancer Treatment Reviews, 98:102217. W.B. Saunders Ltd, Cancer Treatment Reviews, 98:102217. W.B. Saunders
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....49e53a9ea3429d5f89408f1d165b8482