Back to Search Start Over

Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer

Authors :
Rudolf Maibach
Meritxell Bellet
Stefan Buchholz
Marco Colleoni
Hervé Bonnefoi
Richard D. Gelber
Aron Goldhirsch
Charles E. Geyer
James N. Ingle
Harold J. Burstein
István Láng
Nancy E. Davidson
Barbara Walley
Meredith M. Regan
Miguel Angel Climent
Gini F. Fleming
Anita Giobbie-Hurder
Barbara Ruepp
Manuela Rabaglio-Poretti
Prudence A. Francis
Pierre Kerbrat
Gian Antonio Da Prada
Robert E. Coleman
Silvana Martino
Karen N. Price
Eva Ciruelos
Giuseppe Viale
E. P.Manuela Winer
Alan S. Coates
Source :
Francis, Prudence A; Regan, Meredith M; Fleming, Gini F; Láng, István; Ciruelos, Eva; Bellet, Meritxell; Bonnefoi, Hervé R; Climent, Miguel A; Da Prada, Gian Antonio; Burstein, Harold J; Martino, Silvana; Davidson, Nancy E; Geyer, Charles E; Walley, Barbara A; Coleman, Robert; Kerbrat, Pierre; Buchholz, Stefan; Ingle, James N; Winer, Eric P; Rabaglio, Manuela; ... (2015). Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. New England journal of medicine NEJM, 372(5), pp. 436-446. Massachusetts Medical Society MMS 10.1056/NEJMoa1412379
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

BACKGROUND Suppression of ovarian estrogen production reduces the recurrence of hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer in premenopausal women, but its value when added to tamoxifen is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned 3066 premenopausal women, stratified according to prior receipt or nonreceipt of chemotherapy, to receive 5 years of tamoxifen, tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, or exemestane plus ovarian suppression. The primary analysis tested the hypothesis that tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression would improve disease-free survival, as compared with tamoxifen alone. In the primary analysis, 46.7% of the patients had not received chemotherapy previously, and 53.3% had received chemotherapy and remained premenopausal. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 67 months, the estimated disease-free survival rate at 5 years was 86.6% in the tamoxifen-ovarian suppression group and 84.7% in the tamoxifen group (hazard ratio for disease recurrence, second invasive cancer, or death, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 1.04; P=0.10). Multivariable allowance for prognostic factors suggested a greater treatment effect with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression than with tamoxifen alone (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.98). Most recurrences occurred in patients who had received prior chemotherapy, among whom the rate of freedom from breast cancer at 5 years was 82.5% in the tamoxifen-ovarian suppression group and 78.0% in the tamoxifen group (hazard ratio for recurrence, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.02). At 5 years, the rate of freedom from breast cancer was 85.7% in the exemestane-ovarian suppression group (hazard ratio for recurrence vs. tamoxifen, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.87). CONCLUSIONS Adding ovarian suppression to tamoxifen did not provide a significant benefit in the overall study population. However, for women who were at sufficient risk for recurrence to warrant adjuvant chemotherapy and who remained premenopausal, the addition of ovarian suppression improved disease outcomes. Further improvement was seen with the use of exemestane plus ovarian suppression. (Funded by Pfizer and others; SOFT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00066690.).

Details

ISSN :
15334406
Volume :
372
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The New England journal of medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....499ec422cd6a8bc8fd8aebb89b37ccef
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1412379