Back to Search Start Over

Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Revascularization Strategy

Authors :
Chee Hae Kim
Ali Alghamdi
Sayan Sen
Chang-Wook Nam
Kare Tang
Eduardo Alegría-Barrero
Andrew S.P. Sharp
Javier Escaned
Flavo Ribichini
Allen Jeremias
Patrick W. Serruys
John D. Altman
Hiroyoshi Yokoi
Salvatore Brugaletta
Iqbal S. Malik
Murat Sezer
Christopher Cook
Waldemar Bojara
Hugo Vinhas
Carlo Di Mario
Christiaan J. Vrints
Suneel Talwar
Ciro Indolfi
Pedro Canas da Silva
Hernán Mejía-Rentería
Yuetsu Kikuta
Arnold H. Seto
Bruce Samuels
Jan J. Piek
Rasha Al-Lamee
Hitoshi Matsuo
Luc Janssens
Mika Laine
Olaf Going
Rajesh K. Kharbanda
Robert Gerber
Joo Myung Lee
Hakim-Moulay Dehbi
Justin E. Davies
Tobias Härle
Niels van Royen
Nobuhiro Tanaka
Sérgio Bravo Baptista
James Sapontis
Ricardo Petraco
Sukhjinder Nijjer
Ahmed Khashaba
Bon Kwon Koo
Manesh R. Patel
Christopher E. Buller
Eric Van Belle
Giampaolo Niccoli
Martijin Meuwissen
Farrel Hellig
Hiroaki Takashima
Andrejs Erglis
Eun-Seok Shin
Habib Samady
Darren L. Walters
Florian Krackhardt
Jasvindar Singh
Ravinay Bhindi
Sam J. Lehman
Joon Hyung Doh
Cardiology
ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes
HUS Heart and Lung Center
Kardiologian yksikkö
ACS - Microcirculation
Source :
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions, 12, 2035-2046, JACC : cardiovascular interventions, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 12(20), 2035-2046. Elsevier Inc., JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 12(20), 2035-2046. Elsevier Inc., Kim, C H, Koo, B-K, Dehbi, H-M, Lee, J M, Doh, J-H, Nam, C-W, Shin, E-S, Cook, C M, Al-Lamee, R, Petraco, R, Sen, S, Malik, I S, Nijjer, S S, Mejía-Rentería, H, Alegria-Barrero, E, Alghamdi, A, Altman, J, Baptista, S R B, Bhindi, R, Bojara, W, Brugaletta, S, Silva, P C, di Mario, C, Erglis, A, Gerber, R T, Going, O, Härle, T, Hellig, F, Indolfi, C, Janssens, L, Jeremias, A, Kharbanda, R K, Khashaba, A, Kikuta, Y, Krackhardt, F, Laine, M, Lehman, S J, Matsuo, H, Meuwissen, M, Niccoli, G, Piek, J J, Ribichini, F, Samady, H, Sapontis, J, Seto, A H, Sezer, M, Sharp, A S P, Singh, J, Takashima, H, Talwar, S, Tanaka, N, Tang, K, van Belle, E, van Royen, N, Vinhas, H, Vrints, C J, Walters, D, Yokoi, H, Samuels, B, Buller, C, Patel, M R, Serruys, P W, Escaned, J & Davies, J E 2019, ' Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Revascularization Strategy ', JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 2035-2046 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.035, JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions, 12, 20, pp. 2035-2046, Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos), Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC)-FCT-Sociedade da Informação, instacron:RCAAP
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate sex differences in procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)- and fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided revascularization strategies. BACKGROUND: An iFR-guided strategy has shown a lower revascularization rate than an FFR-guided strategy, without differences in clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate stenosis to guide Revascularization) study, in which 601 women and 1,891 men were randomized to iFR- or FFR-guided strategy. The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. RESULTS: Among the entire population, women had a lower number of functionally significant lesions per patient (0.31 +/- 0.51 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.59; p < 0.001) and less frequently underwent revascularization than men (42.1% vs. 53.1%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean iFR value according to sex (0.91 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.91 +/- 0.10; p = 0.442). However, the mean FFR value was lower in men than in women (0.83 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.85 +/- 0.10; p = 0.001). In men, an FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than an iFR-guided strategy (57.1% vs. 49.3%; p = 0.001), but this difference was not observed in women (41.4% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.757). There was no difference in MACE rates between iFR- and FFR-guided strategies in both women (5.4% vs. 5.6%, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.50 to 2.43; p = 0.805) and men (6.6% vs. 7.0%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.46; p = 0.919). CONCLUSIONS: An FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than iFR-guided strategy in men, but not in women. However, iFR- and FFR-guided strategies showed comparable clinical outcomes, regardless of sex. (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to guide Revascularization [DEFINE-FLAIR]; NCT02053038).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19368798
Volume :
12
Issue :
20
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....496e9869e57994add4cc05063e1511b8