Hemodynamic Profiles and Clinical Response to Transcatheter Mitral Repair

Prediction of the clinical response to transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a vexing challenge.This study sought to examine the relation between hemodynamic profiles and outcomes following mitral TEER.Among 378 patients (median age 82 years; 43.9% women), 3 hemodynamic profiles using residual left atrial pressure (LAP) and mitral regurgitation (MR) were defined: type I (optimal), grade ≤1 MR and mean LAP (mLAP) ≤15 mm Hg; type II (mixed), MR grade1 or mLAP15 mm Hg; and type III (poor), MR grade1 and mLAP15 mm Hg. The discrimination of these profiles for predicting outcomes was examined. A positive clinical response to TEER was defined as improvement in New York Heart Association functional class ≥I grade at 1 year without heart failure rehospitalization or death.There were 148 (39.0%) patients classified as optimal (type I), 187 (49.0%) patients as mixed (type II), and 43 (11.0%) patients as poor (type III). For all-cause mortality, survival at 1 year was 91.6%, 82.6%, and 67.9% for types I, II, and III, respectively (HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.44-3.15; P 0.001). For the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure, event-free survival at 1 year was 84.1%, 70.7%, and 53.2% for types I, II, and III, respectively (HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.41-2.65; P 0.001). Hemodynamic profiling was strongly associated with a positive response to TEER, occurring in 73.9%, 57.0%, 35.0%, for types I, II, and III, respectively (P 0.001).In patients undergoing mitral TEER, hemodynamic profiling is prognostic, with superior survival occurring among patients with optimal reduction in MR and normal postprocedural LAP.