Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Authors :
Kazuhiro Kitajima
Shingo Yamamoto
Yusuke Yamada
Yukihisa Tamaki
Toru Suzuki
Yusuke Kawanaka
Masakatsu Trsurusaki
Keitaro Sofue
Takahiko Hashimoto
Rika Yoshida
Michio Nojima
Yukako Nakanishi
Akihiro Kanematsu
Shuken Go
Koichiro Yamakado
Source :
Cureus
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Cureus, 2018.

Abstract

We aimed to compare 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with conventional imaging, including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic computed tomography (CT), and bone scintigraphy, for prostate cancer restaging. Thirty patients (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA: 11.8 ng/mL]) with suspected recurrent prostate cancer following definitive treatment underwent 11C-choline PET/CT and conventional imaging, including pelvic MRI, contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT, and bone scintigraphy. The results were compared with regard to patient- and lesion-based diagnostic performance for local recurrence, and for lymph node and bony metastases using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and McNemar’s test. Documented local recurrence and node and bony metastases were present in 11 (36.7%), 10 (33.3%), and 17 (56.7%) cases, respectively, of the enrolled patients. Patient-based sensitivity / specificity / accuracy / area under the ROC curve for 11C-choline-PET/CT for diagnosing local recurrence were 90.9% / 94.7% / 93.3% / 0.975 and for conventional imaging were 90.9% / 100% / 96.7% / 1.0. Those who underwent 11C-choline-PET/CT for node metastasis were 90.0% / 95.0% / 93.3% / 0.925 and for conventional imaging were 70.0% / 95.0% / 86.7% / 0.905. Those who underwent 11C-choline-PET/CT for bone metastasis were 94.1% / 92.3% / 93.3% / 0.991 and who underwent conventional imaging were 94.1% / 84.6% / 90.0% / 0.982. No significant differences were observed among them. The lesion-based detection rate of 11C-choline PET/CT for local recurrences and node and bone metastases as compared to conventional imaging was 92.9% (13/14) vs. 92.9% (13/14); 87.1% (27/31) vs. 54.8% (17/31); and 96.9% (219/226) vs. 90.3% (204/226) respectively, with significant differences noted for detection of node and bone lesions (p=0.0044 and p=0.00030, respectively). 11C-choline-PET/CT is more accurate in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer nodes and bony metastatic lesions compared to conventional imaging and has the advantage of restaging the disease in a single step.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21688184
Volume :
10
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cureus
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....48ee0d7c00caa22f6435d325ac41f489