Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone versus robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction: a matched analysis
- Source :
- Scientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2020), Scientific Reports
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Nature Publishing Group, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction is a recently developed minimally invasive surgery used in the treatment of patients with rectal cancer. However, its safety and feasibility remain undiscussed and controversial. This study reported the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors pertaining to traditional robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone against that of robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction to provide a discussion on this issue. 49 patients who underwent robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction and 49 matched patients who underwent conventional robotic assisted rectal cancer resection were systematically analyzed in this study. Regarding the baseline characteristics, after matching, no significant differences were observed between the natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) group and the robotic assisted rectal cancer resection (RARC) group. Patients in the NOSE group had a reduced visual analog scale (p p = 0.002) and suffered less surgical stress than those in the RARC group. Moreover, 4 complications were observed in the NOSE group and 7 complications in the RARC group with no significant difference (p = 0.337) in terms of complications. The two groups had a similar survival outcomes, where the 3-year overall survival (p = 0.738) and 3-year progression-free survival (p = 0.986) were all comparable between the two groups. Histological differentiation and T stage could be regarded as independent prognostic factors for 3-year overall survival and 3-year progression-free survival. Robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction is a safe and feasible minimally invasive surgery for patients suffering from rectal cancer as it encompasses considerable several advantages. Histological differentiation and T stage may serve as independent prognostic factors for 3-year overall survival and 3-year progression-free survival.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
medicine.medical_specialty
Surgical stress
Time Factors
Cancer therapy
Adolescent
Visual analogue scale
Robotic assisted
Colorectal cancer
lcsh:Medicine
Natural orifice
Article
Resection
03 medical and health sciences
Young Adult
0302 clinical medicine
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Medicine
Humans
Rectal cancer
lcsh:Science
Nose
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
Aged
Multidisciplinary
business.industry
Rectal Neoplasms
lcsh:R
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Prognosis
Surgery
medicine.anatomical_structure
Treatment Outcome
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
T-stage
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
Female
Laparoscopy
lcsh:Q
Safety
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20452322
- Volume :
- 10
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Scientific Reports
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....48b34f2c6cc9337cfac1ab995d44b1cc
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69830-1