Back to Search Start Over

Multiple molecular evidences for a living mammalian fossil

Authors :
Jürgen Schmitz
Vincent Ranwez
C. William Kilpatrick
Pascale Chevret
Dorothée Huchon
Jürgen Brosius
Ursula Jordan
Paulina D. Jenkins
George S.Wise Faculty of Life Sciences
Tel Aviv University [Tel Aviv]
Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (UMR ISEM)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut de recherche pour le développement [IRD] : UR226-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE)
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU)
Department of biology, University of Vermont
University of Vermont [Burlington]
Department of zoology
The Natural History Museum
Source :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104 (18), pp.7495-7499. ⟨10.1073/pnas.0701289104⟩
Publication Year :
2007
Publisher :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007.

Abstract

Laonastes aenigmamus is an enigmatic rodent first described in 2005. Molecular and morphological data suggested that it is the sole representative of a new mammalian family, the Laonastidae, and a member of the Hystricognathi. However, the validity of this family is controversial because fossil-based phylogenetic analyses suggest that Laonastes is a surviving member of the Diatomyidae, a family considered to have been extinct for 11 million years. According to these data, Laonastes and Diatomyidae are the sister clade of extant Ctenodactylidae (i.e., gundies) and do not belong to the Hystricognathi. To solve the phylogenetic position of Laonastes , we conducted a large-scale molecular phylogeny of rodents. The analysis includes representatives of all major rodent taxonomic groups and was based on 5.5 kb of sequence data from four nuclear and two mitochondrial genes. To further validate the obtained results, a short interspersed element insertion analysis including 11 informative loci was also performed. Our molecular data based on sequence and short interspersed element analyses unambiguously placed Laonastes as a sister clade of gundies. All alternative hypotheses were significantly rejected based on Shimodaira–Hasegawa tests, supporting the idea that Laonastes does not belong to the Hystricognathi. Molecular dating analysis also supports an ancient divergence, ≈44 Mya ago, between Ctenodactylidae and Laonastes . These combined analyses support the hypothesis that Laonastes is indeed a living fossil. Protection of this surviving species would conserve an ancient mammalian family.

Details

ISSN :
10916490 and 00278424
Volume :
104
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....47150028ed449d11c4d427ead99ef24a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701289104