Back to Search
Start Over
Using labelled internal standards to improve needle trap micro-extraction technique prior to gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
- Source :
- Talanta (Oxf.) 200 (2019): 145–155. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2019.03.046, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Biagini, Denise; Lomonaco, Tommaso; Ghimenti, Silvia; Onor, Massimo; Bellagambi, Francesca G.; Salvo, Pietro; Di Francesco, Fabio; Fuoco, Roger/titolo:Using labelled internal standards to improve needle trap micro-extraction technique prior to gas chromatography%2Fmass spectrometry/doi:10.1016%2Fj.talanta.2019.03.046/rivista:Talanta (Oxf.)/anno:2019/pagina_da:145/pagina_a:155/intervallo_pagine:145–155/volume:200
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- When working with humid gaseous samples, the amount of water vapour collected in a needle trap along with volatile analytes may vary from sample to sample and decrease during the storage. This has a major impact on desorption efficiency and recovery. We propose the addition of a labelled internal standards to nullify the effect of variable humidity on the analytical performance of needle trap micro-extraction combined with gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Triple-bed (Divinylbenzene/Carbopack X/Carboxen 1000) and single-bed (Tenax GR) needles were tested with standard gaseous mixtures prepared at different relative humidity levels (85%, 50% and 10%). The standard mixtures contained twenty-five analytes representative of breath and ambient air constituents, including hydrocarbons, ketones, aldehydes, aromatics, and sulphurs, in the concentration range 0.1-700 ppbv. The two needles showed different behaviours, as recovery was independent of humidity for single-beds, whereas a low recovery (10-20%) was observed when triple-beds trapped very volatile compounds at low humidity (e.g. pentane and ethanol, 10% relative humidity. Triple-beds showed an almost quantitative recovery (>90%) of all the analytes at 50% and 85% relative humidity. This big difference was probably due to the reduced action of water vapour pressure during the desorption step. The addition of 6 D-acetone and 8 D-toluene to the sorbent material before gas sampling and the normalization of raw data nullified this effect, thereby lowering the variations of analyte recovery at different humidity levels down to 20%. Internal standards were also exploited to limit within 10-20% alterations in peak areas of very volatile compounds during needle storage at room temperature. This variation may results from a loss of water vapour either retained from the sorbent material and/or condensed on triple-bed needle walls. After normalization, the inter- and intra-day precision were halved to 5% and 10% in the case of single-beds, respectively, and to 15% and 20% with three-beds. The addition of an internal standard to the sorbent helps to keep the overall analytical procedure under control and improves the reliability of needle trap micro-extraction for the analysis of volatile organic compounds at ultra-trace levels.
- Subjects :
- Sorbent
Tenax
02 engineering and technology
Biochemistry
01 natural sciences
Analytical Chemistry
chemistry.chemical_compound
Labelled internal standards
Needle trap micro-extraction
Relative humidity
Volatile organic compounds
Spectroscopy
Chromatography
Chemistry
Chemistry (all)
010401 analytical chemistry
Breath analysis
Humidity
GC-MS
021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology
0104 chemical sciences
Pentane
Breath gas analysis
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
0210 nano-technology
Water vapor
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00399140
- Volume :
- 200
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Talanta
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....46e04c0cb5c2155f231c8e465b3f5769
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.03.046