Back to Search Start Over

The global aerosol-climate model echam6.3-ham2.3: Part 1: Aerosol evaluation

Authors :
Tegen, Ina
Neubauer, David
Ferrachat, Sylvaine
Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe
Bey, Isabelle
Schutgens, Nick
Stier, Philip
Watson-Parris, Duncan
Stanelle, Tanja
Schmidt, Hauke
Rast, Sebastian
Kokkola, Harri
Schultz, Martin
Schroeder, Sabine
Daskalakis, Nikos
Barthel, Stefan
Heinold, Bernd
Lohmann, Ulrike
Earth and Climate
Source :
Geoscientific Model Development, 12(4), 1643-1677. Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH, Geoscientific Model Development, 12 (4), Tegen, I, Neubauer, D, Ferrachat, S, Drian, C S L, Bey, I, Schutgens, N, Stier, P, Watson-Parris, D, Stanelle, T, Schmidt, H, Rast, S, Kokkola, H, Schultz, M, Schroeder, S, Daskalakis, N, Barthel, S, Heinold, B & Lohmann, U 2019, ' The global aerosol-climate model echam6.3-ham2.3 : Part 1: Aerosol evaluation ', Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1643-1677 . https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

We introduce and evaluate aerosol simulations with the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3, which is the aerosol component of the fully coupled aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM–HAMMOZ. Both the host atmospheric climate model ECHAM6.3 and the aerosol model HAM2.3 were updated from previous versions. The updated version of the HAM aerosol model contains improved parameterizations of aerosol processes such as cloud activation, as well as updated emission fields for anthropogenic aerosol species and modifications in the online computation of sea salt and mineral dust aerosol emissions. Aerosol results from nudged and free-running simulations for the 10-year period 2003 to 2012 are compared to various measurements of aerosol properties. While there are regional deviations between the model and observations, the model performs well overall in terms of aerosol optical thickness, but may underestimate coarse-mode aerosol concentrations to some extent so that the modeled particles are smaller than indicated by the observations. Sulfate aerosol measurements in the US and Europe are reproduced well by the model, while carbonaceous aerosol species are biased low. Both mineral dust and sea salt aerosol concentrations are improved compared to previous versions of ECHAM–HAM. The evaluation of the simulated aerosol distributions serves as a basis for the suitability of the model for simulating aerosol–climate interactions in a changing climate.<br />Geoscientific Model Development, 12 (4)<br />ISSN:1991-9603<br />ISSN:1991-959X

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19919603 and 1991959X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Geoscientific Model Development, 12(4), 1643-1677. Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH, Geoscientific Model Development, 12 (4), Tegen, I, Neubauer, D, Ferrachat, S, Drian, C S L, Bey, I, Schutgens, N, Stier, P, Watson-Parris, D, Stanelle, T, Schmidt, H, Rast, S, Kokkola, H, Schultz, M, Schroeder, S, Daskalakis, N, Barthel, S, Heinold, B & Lohmann, U 2019, ' The global aerosol-climate model echam6.3-ham2.3 : Part 1: Aerosol evaluation ', Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1643-1677 . https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....467a15f71e23bac94f6cc82ff8168a31
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019