Back to Search Start Over

Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions

Authors :
Xiaoying Shi
Anna M. Michalak
Nicholas C. Parazoo
Weile Wang
Chaoqun Lu
Akihiko Ito
Daniel J. Hayes
Anthony W. King
Joshua B. Fisher
Christopher R. Schwalm
Benjamin Poulter
Yaxing Wei
Yuanyuan Fang
Kevin Schaefer
Huimin Lei
Atul K. Jain
Robert B. Cook
P. Ciais
Deborah N. Huntzinger
Maoyi Huang
Jiafu Mao
Shushi Peng
Hanqin Tian
Fang Zhao
Daniel M. Ricciuto
Fabienne Maignan
Ning Zeng
Northern Arizona University [Flagstaff]
Carnegie Institution for Science
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
ICOS-ATC (ICOS-ATC)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory [Oak Ridge] (ORNL)
UT-Battelle, LLC
University of Colorado [Boulder]
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH)
University of Maine
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [Urbana]
University of Illinois System
Tsinghua University [Beijing] (THU)
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology
Iowa State University (ISU)
Modélisation des Surfaces et Interfaces Continentales (MOSAIC)
Montana State University (MSU)
Environmental Sciences Division [Oak Ridge]
UT-Battelle, LLC-UT-Battelle, LLC
Auburn University (AU)
NASA Ames Research Center (ARC)
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science [College Park] (AOSC)
University of Maryland [College Park]
University of Maryland System-University of Maryland System
Carnegie Institution for Science [Washington]
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
California Institute of Technology (CALTECH)-NASA
Source :
Scientific Reports, Scientific Reports, 2017, 7 (1), pp.4765. ⟨10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2⟩, Scientific reports, vol 7, iss 1, Scientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2017), Scientific Reports, Nature Publishing Group, 2017, 7 (1), pp.4765. ⟨10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2⟩
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2017.

Abstract

Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospheric CO2, and other factors, however, remains unclear despite decades of research. Here, we use an ensemble of land models to show that models disagree on the primary driver of cumulative C uptake for 85% of vegetated land area. Disagreement is largest in model sensitivity to rising atmospheric CO2 which shows almost twice the variability in cumulative land uptake since 1901 (1 s.d. of 212.8 PgC vs. 138.5 PgC, respectively). We find that variability in CO2 and temperature sensitivity is attributable, in part, to their compensatory effects on C uptake, whereby comparable estimates of C uptake can arise by invoking different sensitivities to key environmental conditions. Conversely, divergent estimates of C uptake can occur despite being based on the same environmental sensitivities. Together, these findings imply an important limitation to the predictability of C cycling and climate under unprecedented environmental conditions. We suggest that the carbon modeling community prioritize a probabilistic multi-model approach to generate more robust C cycle projections.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20452322
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Scientific Reports, Scientific Reports, 2017, 7 (1), pp.4765. ⟨10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2⟩, Scientific reports, vol 7, iss 1, Scientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2017), Scientific Reports, Nature Publishing Group, 2017, 7 (1), pp.4765. ⟨10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....466acd85af7a3db87d28987e93fbb4d0
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2⟩