Back to Search
Start Over
Potentialities and limitations of computer-aided design and manufacturing technology in the nonextraction treatment of Class I malocclusion
- Source :
- Web of Science, Repositório Institucional da UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), instacron:UNESP
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-25T12:30:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2021-01-01 Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Introduction: Computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) systems have assisted orthodontists to position brackets virtually. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a CAD-CAM system could predict the orthodontic treatment outcome of patients with Angle Class I malocclusion with mild crowding or spacing and with no need for orthodontic extraction. Methods: Using the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation (ABO-CRE) and color map superimposition, the treated occlusion was compared with the virtual final occlusion of 24 young adults with Class I occlusion. Using eXceed software (eXceed, Witten, Germany), we created the final occlusion prediction for each patient (virtual set up group). A digital model of the final occlusion of each patient was created (treated occlusion group). ABO-CRE score was used to compare groups. In addition, a color map was created for all subjects to access the mean and range values between the virtual set up model and treated occlusion model of each patient. Random and systematic errors were calculated. In addition, chi-square and t test were used. Results: Comparisons between virtual set up occlusion and treated occlusion showed statistically significant differences in 3 out of 7 measurements: interproximal contact score was larger for treated than virtual occlusion (0.45 mm and 0.04 mm, respectively), and the treated occlusion showed larger values than the virtual occlusion for occlusal contacts (14.13 mm and 7.62 mm, respectively) and overjet (7.37 mm and 0.66 mm, respectively). Although the treated occlusion showed a larger score than the virtual occlusion (50.41 mm and 34.58 mm, respectively), there is no significant difference between both. Root angulation decreased (from 1.95 +/- 1.29 to 0.65 +/- 0.71) because of the treatment. Conclusion: ABO-CRE overall score presents no difference between groups. In addition, CAD-CAM setup occlusion closely predicts the final teeth alignment and leveling with interarch relationships showing less ABO-CRE score deduction. Sao Paulo State Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP, Brazil Sao Paulo State Univ, Inst Chem, Dept Phys Chem, Araraquara, SP, Brazil Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, 7500 Cambridge St,Ste 5130, Houston, TX 77030 USA Sao Paulo State Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP, Brazil Sao Paulo State Univ, Inst Chem, Dept Phys Chem, Araraquara, SP, Brazil CNPq: 168131/2017-0
- Subjects :
- Orthodontics
Manufacturing technology
business.industry
Overjet
Treatment outcome
Malocclusion, Angle Class I
030206 dentistry
Overbite
Class i malocclusion
medicine.disease
Models, Dental
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Occlusion
medicine
Computer-Aided Design
Humans
Superimposition
Malocclusion
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 08895406
- Volume :
- 159
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....4653c7fb867d25713e56781651e5b28b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.020