Back to Search Start Over

Mode of Delivery and Risk of Celiac Disease: Risk of Celiac Disease and Age at Gluten Introduction Cohort Study

Authors :
Lionetti, E
Castellaneta, S
Francavilla, R
Pulvirenti, Alfredo
Catassi, C
SIGENP Working Group of Weaning
Risk, Cd
Source :
The Journal of Pediatrics. 184:81-86.e2
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2017.

Abstract

Objective To determine whether the mode of delivery is associated with the risk of celiac disease (CD) in a cohort of children genetically predisposed to CD prospectively followed from birth. Study design By telephone interview, we recorded information on the mode of delivery of children participating in the Risk of Celiac Disease and Age at Gluten Introduction study, a multicenter, prospective intervention trial that compared early and delayed introduction of gluten in infants with at least 1 first-degree relative affected with CD. The human leukocyte antigen genotype was determined at 15 months of age, and serologic screening for CD was performed at 15, 24, and 36 months of age and at 5, 8, and 10 years of age. Patients with positive serologic findings underwent intestinal biopsy. The primary outcome of the current study was the prevalence of CD autoimmunity and overt CD at 5 years of age, according to the mode of delivery. Results The study-group included 553 children at CD risk because of positivity for human leukocyte antigen-DQ2, -DQ8, or both. We obtained data on the mode of delivery from 431 of 553 children; 233 of 431 children were born by vaginal delivery (54%). At 5 years of age, the prevalence of CD autoimmunity or overt CD was not different between children born by cesarean or vaginal delivery (24% and 19%, P = .2; 19% and 14%, P = .2 respectively, by the log-rank test). Conclusions In this cohort of children genetically predisposed to CD, the mode of delivery did not influence the risk of developing CD.

Details

ISSN :
00223476
Volume :
184
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of Pediatrics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4642f028a417b6a8cf6e5a22766479e4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.01.023