Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care

Authors :
Huib A. M. Kerstjens
Philippe L Salomé
Niels H. Chavannes
Daniel Kotz
Guus M. Asijee
Sebastiaan Holverda
Thys van der Molen
Onno C. P. van Schayck
Lucas M A Goossens
Johannes C C M In 't Veen
Gerard J. P. van Breukelen
Annerika Slok
P. N. Richard Dekhuijzen
Mascha Twellaar
Maureen P.M.H. Rutten-van Mölken
Family Medicine
RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care
FPN Methodologie & Statistiek
FHML Methodologie & Statistiek
RS: FPN M&S I
RS: CAPHRI - R1 - Ageing and Long-Term Care
Ondersteunend personeel PHPC
RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care
Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC)
Source :
BMJ Open, 6(7):e011519. BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ Open, 6, e011519, BMJ Open, BMJ Open, 6, 7, pp. e011519, BMJ Open, 6(7), BMJ Open, 6(7):011519. BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2016.

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 165996.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) OBJECTIVE: Assessing the effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on disease-specific quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) measured with the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), compared with usual care. METHODS: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, in 39 Dutch primary care practices and 17 hospitals, with 357 patients with COPD (postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio /=40 years, who could understand and read the Dutch language. Healthcare providers were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The intervention group applied the ABC tool, which consists of a short validated questionnaire assessing the experienced burden of COPD, objective COPD parameter (eg, lung function) and a treatment algorithm including a visual display and treatment advice. The control group provided usual care. Researchers were blinded to group allocation during analyses. Primary outcome was the number of patients with a clinically relevant improvement in SGRQ score between baseline and 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC; a measurement of perceived quality of care). RESULTS: At 18-month follow-up, 34% of the 146 patients from 27 healthcare providers in the intervention group showed a clinically relevant improvement in the SGRQ, compared with 22% of the 148 patients from 29 healthcare providers in the control group (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.16). No difference was found on the CAT (-0.26 points (scores ranging from 0 to 40); 95% CI -1.52 to 0.99). The PACIC showed a higher improvement in the intervention group (0.32 points (scores ranging from 1 to 5); 95% CI 0.14 to 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that use of the ABC tool may increase quality of life and perceived quality of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR3788; Results.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
6
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMJ Open
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....45edb66904ed6d52eefca894f5962833