Back to Search
Start Over
Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care
- Source :
- BMJ Open, 6(7):e011519. BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ Open, 6, e011519, BMJ Open, BMJ Open, 6, 7, pp. e011519, BMJ Open, 6(7), BMJ Open, 6(7):011519. BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- BMJ Publishing Group, 2016.
-
Abstract
- Contains fulltext : 165996.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) OBJECTIVE: Assessing the effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on disease-specific quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) measured with the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), compared with usual care. METHODS: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, in 39 Dutch primary care practices and 17 hospitals, with 357 patients with COPD (postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio /=40 years, who could understand and read the Dutch language. Healthcare providers were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The intervention group applied the ABC tool, which consists of a short validated questionnaire assessing the experienced burden of COPD, objective COPD parameter (eg, lung function) and a treatment algorithm including a visual display and treatment advice. The control group provided usual care. Researchers were blinded to group allocation during analyses. Primary outcome was the number of patients with a clinically relevant improvement in SGRQ score between baseline and 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC; a measurement of perceived quality of care). RESULTS: At 18-month follow-up, 34% of the 146 patients from 27 healthcare providers in the intervention group showed a clinically relevant improvement in the SGRQ, compared with 22% of the 148 patients from 29 healthcare providers in the control group (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.16). No difference was found on the CAT (-0.26 points (scores ranging from 0 to 40); 95% CI -1.52 to 0.99). The PACIC showed a higher improvement in the intervention group (0.32 points (scores ranging from 1 to 5); 95% CI 0.14 to 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that use of the ABC tool may increase quality of life and perceived quality of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR3788; Results.
- Subjects :
- Male
BASE-LINE
Health Status
Communication tool
Severity of Illness Index
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
0302 clinical medicine
Cost of Illness
Surveys and Questionnaires
030212 general & internal medicine
Cluster randomised controlled trial
Disease management (health)
Respiratory Medicine
Netherlands
COPD
Shared Decision Making
Disease Management
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Hospitals
Hospitalization
Patient Satisfaction
Female
CHRONIC ILLNESS
CLINICAL-TRIALS
medicine.medical_specialty
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Patient-centred care
OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE
03 medical and health sciences
FEV1/FVC ratio
Patient satisfaction
Quality of life (healthcare)
Severity of illness
medicine
Humans
SELF-MANAGEMENT
ASSESSMENT TEST CAT
Aged
Quality of Health Care
Primary Health Care
business.industry
Research
medicine.disease
GEORGES RESPIRATORY QUESTIONNAIRE
MODEL
Clinical trial
030228 respiratory system
Inflammatory diseases Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 5]
Quality of Life
Physical therapy
SHARED DECISION-MAKING
business
TIOTROPIUM
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20446055
- Volume :
- 6
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMJ Open
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....45edb66904ed6d52eefca894f5962833