Back to Search
Start Over
Upfront Surgical Resection of Melanoma Brain Metastases Provides a Bridge Toward Immunotherapy-Mediated Systemic Control
- Source :
- The Oncologist. 24:671-679
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019.
-
Abstract
- Background Immune checkpoint blockade has systemic efficacy in patients with metastatic melanoma, including those with brain metastases (MBMs). However, immunotherapy-induced intracranial tumoral inflammation can lead to neurologic compromise, requiring steroids, which abrogate the systemic efficacy of this approach. We investigated whether upfront neurosurgical resection of MBM is associated with a therapeutic advantage when performed prior to initiation of immunotherapy. Material and methods An institutional review board-approved, retrospective study identified 142 patients with MBM treated with immune checkpoint blockade between 2010 and 2016 at Massachusetts General Hospital, of whom 79 received surgery. Patients were classified based on the temporal relationship between immunotherapy, surgery, and development of central nervous system metastases. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis of MBM until death from any cause. Multivariate model building included a prognostic Cox model of OS, the effect of immunotherapy and surgical sequencing on OS, and the effect of immunotherapy and radiation sequencing on OS. Results The 2-year overall survival for patients treated with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, programmed death 1, or combinatorial blockade was 19%, 54%, and 57%, respectively. Among immunotherapy-naive melanoma brain metastases, surgery followed by immunotherapy had a median survival of 22.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.6-39.2) compared with 10.8 months for patients treated with immunotherapy alone (95% CI, 7.8-16.3) and 9.4 months for patients treated with immunotherapy followed by surgery (95% CI, 4.1 to ∞; p = .12). On multivariate analysis, immunotherapy-naive brain metastases treated with immunotherapy alone were associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.00-2.99) compared with immunotherapy-naive brain metastases treated with surgery followed by immunotherapy. Conclusion In treatment-naive patients, early surgical resection for local control should be considered prior to commencing immunotherapy. A prospective, randomized trial comparing the sequence of surgery and immunotherapy for treatment-naive melanoma brain metastases is warranted. Implications for practice In this retrospective study of 142 patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with immune checkpoint blockade, the development of melanoma brain metastases following immunotherapy was associated with decreased survival compared with diagnosis of immunotherapy-naive brain metastases. The benefit of surgical intervention was seen in immunotherapy-naive brain metastases in contrast to brain metastases that developed on immunotherapy. These results suggest that upfront local control with surgery for immunotherapy-naive melanoma brain metastasis may provide a bridge toward immunotherapy-mediated systemic control.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
Oncology
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Skin Neoplasms
medicine.medical_treatment
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Radiosurgery
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0302 clinical medicine
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
CTLA-4 Antigen
Neuro‐Oncology
Prospective Studies
Melanoma
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Neoplasms
business.industry
Proportional hazards model
Hazard ratio
Age Factors
Brain
Retrospective cohort study
Immunotherapy
Middle Aged
Prognosis
medicine.disease
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Immune checkpoint
Blockade
Treatment Outcome
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Female
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Follow-Up Studies
Brain metastasis
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1549490X and 10837159
- Volume :
- 24
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Oncologist
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....45ecce435869663e05a5fa277ce9ea37