Back to Search Start Over

Dutch outcome in implantable cardioverterdefibrillator therapy

Authors :
Pascal F.H.M. van Dessel
Erik Buskens
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
Arthur A.M. Wilde
Pepijn H. van der Voort
Geert-Jan Kimman
Aeilko H. Zwinderman
Dominic A.M.J. Theuns
Tom E Verstraelen
Marit van Barreveld
Anton E. Tuinenburg
Lucas V.A. Boersma
Peter Paul H.M. Delnoy
Cardiology
Clinical Research Unit
Graduate School
ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias
APH - Methodology
Epidemiology and Data Science
Value, Affordability and Sustainability (VALUE)
Source :
Journal of the American Heart Association, 10(7):e018063. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of the American Heart Association, 10(7):e018063. Wiley-Blackwell, Journal of the American Heart Association, 10(7):018063. Wiley, Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2021.

Abstract

Background One third of primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator patients receive appropriate therapy, but all remain at risk of defibrillator complications. Information on these complications in contemporary cohorts is limited. This study assessed complications and their risk factors after defibrillator implantation in a Dutch nationwide prospective registry cohort and forecasts the potential reduction in complications under distinct scenarios of updated indication criteria. Methods and Results Complications in a prospective multicenter registry cohort of 1442 primary implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator implant patients were classified as major or minor. The potential for reducing complications was derived from a newly developed prediction model of appropriate therapy to identify patients with a low probability of benefitting from the implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator. During a follow‐up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 2.0–2.6 years), 228 complications occurred in 195 patients (13.6%), with 113 patients (7.8%) experiencing at least one major complication. Most common ones were lead related (n=93) and infection (n=18). Minor complications occurred in 6.8% of patients, with lead‐related (n=47) and pocket‐related (n=40) complications as the most prevailing ones. A surgical reintervention or additional hospitalization was required in 53% or 61% of complications, respectively. Complications were strongly associated with device type. Application of stricter implant indication results in a comparable proportional reduction of (major) complications. Conclusions One in 13 patients experiences at least one major implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator–related complication, and many patients undergo a surgical reintervention. Complications are related to defibrillator implantations, and these should be discussed with the patient. Stricter implant indication criteria and careful selection of device type implanted may have significant clinical and financial benefits.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20479980
Volume :
10
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American Heart Association
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....45e83f35e1f0839fee75c48e66d2dc11
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018063