Back to Search
Start Over
Dutch outcome in implantable cardioverterdefibrillator therapy
- Source :
- Journal of the American Heart Association, 10(7):e018063. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of the American Heart Association, 10(7):e018063. Wiley-Blackwell, Journal of the American Heart Association, 10(7):018063. Wiley, Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Background One third of primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator patients receive appropriate therapy, but all remain at risk of defibrillator complications. Information on these complications in contemporary cohorts is limited. This study assessed complications and their risk factors after defibrillator implantation in a Dutch nationwide prospective registry cohort and forecasts the potential reduction in complications under distinct scenarios of updated indication criteria. Methods and Results Complications in a prospective multicenter registry cohort of 1442 primary implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator implant patients were classified as major or minor. The potential for reducing complications was derived from a newly developed prediction model of appropriate therapy to identify patients with a low probability of benefitting from the implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator. During a follow‐up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 2.0–2.6 years), 228 complications occurred in 195 patients (13.6%), with 113 patients (7.8%) experiencing at least one major complication. Most common ones were lead related (n=93) and infection (n=18). Minor complications occurred in 6.8% of patients, with lead‐related (n=47) and pocket‐related (n=40) complications as the most prevailing ones. A surgical reintervention or additional hospitalization was required in 53% or 61% of complications, respectively. Complications were strongly associated with device type. Application of stricter implant indication results in a comparable proportional reduction of (major) complications. Conclusions One in 13 patients experiences at least one major implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator–related complication, and many patients undergo a surgical reintervention. Complications are related to defibrillator implantations, and these should be discussed with the patient. Stricter implant indication criteria and careful selection of device type implanted may have significant clinical and financial benefits.
- Subjects :
- Male
Reoperation
inappropriate shocks
medicine.medical_specialty
complications
medicine.medical_treatment
indication
Electric Countershock
implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator
Arrhythmias
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Risk Assessment
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Prosthesis Implantation
03 medical and health sciences
defibrillator
Postoperative Complications
0302 clinical medicine
Risk Factors
Interquartile range
Primary prevention
Humans
Medicine
Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Registries
030212 general & internal medicine
Major complication
implantable cardioverter‐
Original Research
Aged
Netherlands
Quality and Outcomes
business.industry
Patient Selection
Device type
Defibrillators, Implantable
Surgery
Primary Prevention
Equipment Failure Analysis
Death, Sudden, Cardiac
Cohort
Female
Implant
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Complication
business
Catheter Ablation and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
Needs Assessment
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20479980
- Volume :
- 10
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American Heart Association
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....45e83f35e1f0839fee75c48e66d2dc11
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018063