Back to Search Start Over

Nausea and vomiting following thyroid and parathyroid surgery

Authors :
James M. Sonner
James M. Hynson
Orlo H. Clark
Jeffrey A. Katz
Source :
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 9:398-402
Publication Year :
1997
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 1997.

Abstract

Study Objectives: To determine the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following thyroid and parathyroid surgery. To determine whether PONV is reduced when propofol is used for maintenance of anesthesia as compared to isoflurane and to evaluate the costs and resource consumption associated with these two anesthetic regimens. Design: Randomized, prospective study. Setting: University-affiliated hospital—a referral center for endocrinologic surgery. Patients: 118 ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 18 years and older, undergoing elective thyroid or parathyroid surgery. Interventions: Patients received either isoflurane (0.5 to 1.3% end-tidal) or propofol (50 to 200 μg/kg/min) for maintenance of anesthesia. All patients received propofol for induction of anesthesia, succinylcholine or vecuronium, nitrous oxide, and fentanyl. Prophylactic antiemetics were not administered. Postoperative pain was treated with ketorolac, fentanyl, or acetaminophen. Measurements and Main Results: Signs and symptoms of nausea and vomiting were graded on a four point scale as 1=no nausea; 2=mild nausea; 3=severe nausea; 4=retching and/or vomiting. Grades 3 and 4 were grouped together as PONV. The combined incidence of PONV was 54% over the 24-hour postoperative evaluation period. PONV was significantly more common in patients receiving isoflurane than propofol for maintenance of anesthesia (64% vs. 44%). In women (n = 87), the incidence of PONV was significantly greater in those patients who received isoflurane than those who received propofol for maintenance (71% vs. 42%). However, in men (n = 31), there was no significant difference in PONV between anesthetic regimens (47% with isoflurane vs . 50% with propofol). There were no differences in the duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, time to discharge from the hospital, or local wound complications (hematomas) between groups. The use of propofol for maintenance of anesthesia was associated with an additional cost, relative to the isoflurane group, of $54.26 per patient. Conclusion: Patients undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery are at high risk for the development of PONV. Propofol for maintenance of anesthesia, although more expensive than isoflurane, reduces the rate of PONV in women.

Details

ISSN :
09528180
Volume :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....45579f0a250739b026dec9dbd78a4518
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00069-x