Back to Search Start Over

Redo coloanal anastomosis for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: an analysis of 59 cases

Authors :
Emma Westerduin
Gijsbert D. Musters
Albert Wolthuis
Pieter J. Tanis
M. Westerterp
Wernard A. A. Borstlap
André D'Hoore
W. A. Bemelman
A. A. W. van Geloven
Surgery
CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life
AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism
Source :
Colorectal disease, 20(1), 35-43. Wiley-Blackwell
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Wiley, 2018.

Abstract

AimThe construction of a new coloanal anastomosis (CAA) following anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection (LAR) is challenging. The available literature on this topic is scarce. The aim of this two-centre study was to determine the clinical success and morbidity after redo CAA. MethodThis retrospective cohort study included all patients with anastomotic leakage after LAR for rectal cancer who underwent a redo CAA between 2010 and 2014 in two tertiary referral centres. Short- and long-term morbidity were analysed, including both anastomotic leakage and permanent stoma rates on completion of follow-up. ResultsA total of 59 patients were included, of whom 45 (76%) were men, with a mean age of 59years (SD9.4). The median interval between index and redo surgery was 14months [interquartile range (IQR) 8-27]. The median duration of follow-up was 27months (IQR 17-36). The most frequent complication was anastomotic leakage of the redo CAA occurring in 24 patients (41%), resulting in a median of three reinterventions (IQR 2-4) per patient. At the end of follow-up, bowel continuity was restored in 39/59 (66%) patients. Fourteen (24%) patients received a definitive colostomy and six (10%) still had a diverting ileostomy. In a multivariable model, leakage of the redo CAA was the only risk factor for permanent stoma (OR 0.022; 95% CI 0.004-0.122). ConclusionRedo CAA is a viable option in selected patients with persisting leakage after LAR for rectal cancer who want their bowel continuity restored. However, patients should be fully informed about the relatively high morbidity and reintervention rates

Details

ISSN :
14628910
Volume :
20
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Colorectal Disease
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4521d5567ee197055154766c70763f36